AW: Java8 and APT

2013-12-23 Thread jhm
We already have a warning in the manual: "Be advised that the Apt tool does appear to be an unstable part of the JDK framework, so may change radically in future versions. In particular it is likely to be obsolete in JDK 6, which can run annotation processors as part of javac." So j

Re: Java8 and APT

2013-12-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-12-23, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > in fact the apt command line executable does not exist in Java 1.8. didn't notice that. > Our best bet is most likely to say that the apt task does not run > under Java 1.8 and bypass the apt tests under Java 1.8 > I just

Re: Java8 and APT

2013-12-22 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hello, in fact the apt command line executable does not exist in Java 1.8. Our best bet is most likely to say that the apt task does not run under Java 1.8 and bypass the apt tests under Java 1.8 I just did that. Regards, Antoine On Dec 22, 2013, at 2:32 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi

Java8 and APT

2013-12-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, I just gave the new Java8 EA b120 a spin and the only things failing are the apt tests[1] (and there still are > 100 javadoc errors, but that's a different story). If anybody familiar with apt could give it a look that would be great. It may be worth fixing this before 1.9.3.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43782] - apt-task: fork will always be false.

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43782] - apt-task: fork will always be false.

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
LICATE | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-02 07:05 --- I am re-opening - it should be a duplicate of 32099. That bug report says that it is nearly impossible to get apt to work if fork is false. In the apt code this is now enforced. Is there something incorrect with the code

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43782] - apt-task: fork will always be false.

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43782] - apt-task: fork will always be false.

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43782] New: - apt-task: fork will always be false.

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43782 Summary: apt-task: fork will always be false. Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2007-04-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41280] - APT Task ignores memoryMaximumSize argument

2007-01-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41280] - APT Task ignores memoryMaximumSize argument

2007-01-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41280] New: - APT Task ignores memoryMaximumSize argument

2007-01-02 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41280 Summary: APT Task ignores memoryMaximumSize argument Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36629] - Apt task fails when compile="false" specified

2006-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37127] - The Apt task needs a way to reference options declared externally

2006-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36629] - Apt task fails when compile="false" specified

2006-11-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37127] - The Apt task needs a way to reference options declared externally

2006-11-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36629] - Apt task fails when compile="false" specified

2006-10-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37127] - The Apt task needs a way to reference options declared externally

2006-10-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36629] - Apt task fails when compile="false" specified

2006-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37127] - The Apt task needs a way to reference options declared externally

2006-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r439448 [6/6] - in /ant/core/trunk: ./ docs/ docs/manual/stylesheets/ src/etc/ src/etc/checkstyle/ src/etc/testcases/core/containersrc/test/ src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/apt/ src/etc/testcas

2006-09-01 Thread bodewig
Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util/DateUtilsTest.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util/DateUtilsTest.java?rev=439448&r1=439447&r2=439448&view=diff

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36629] - Apt task fails when compile="false" specified

2006-08-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37127] - The Apt task needs a way to reference options declared externally

2006-08-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37618] - APT task fails with too many files

2006-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37618] - APT task fails with too many files

2006-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37618] - APT task fails with too many files

2005-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37618] - APT task fails with too many files

2005-11-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37618] New: - APT task fails with too many files

2005-11-23 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37618 Summary: APT task fails with too many files Product: Ant Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly) Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37127] - The Apt task needs a way to reference options declared externally

2005-10-17 Thread bugzilla
w) and then refer to both when calling the Apt task. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37127] - The Apt task needs a way to reference options declared externally

2005-10-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37127] - The Apt task needs a way to reference options declared externally

2005-10-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37127] New: - The Apt task needs a way to reference options declared externally

2005-10-17 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37127 Summary: The Apt task needs a way to reference options declared externally Product: Ant Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly) Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36629] New: - Apt task fails when compile="false" specified

2005-09-12 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36629 Summary: Apt task fails when compile="false" specified Product: Ant Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly) Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34719] - apt

2005-05-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34530] - APT Task Documentation is missing

2005-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34530] - APT Task Documentation is missing

2005-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34530] - APT Task Documentation is missing

2005-04-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34530] - APT Task Documentation is missing

2005-04-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34530] New: - APT Task Documentation is missing

2005-04-19 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34530 Summary: APT Task Documentation is missing Product: Ant Version: 1.6.3beta1 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Documen

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-04-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-04-17 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33882 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-17 02:22 --- Created an attachment (id=14736) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14736&action=view) Forcing fork on apt task Patches welcome, patch sent :-) Sorry for the delay

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2005-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2005-04-11 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-12 01:08 --- (In reply to comment #20 > Change your ant task to put tools.jar on ant's classpath argument and it > should work. should have said Change your apt task to put tools.jar on ant

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2005-04-11 Thread bugzilla
problem (see 2 below) that I hope someone can > help with. Apt has a -classpath option which it uses to find user class files AND Annotation Processor Factories. each processor factory must extend that class that is not being found, I suspect the error occurs when loading factories. I suspec

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2005-04-11 Thread bugzilla
|FIXED | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-11 23:18 --- I discovered some problems/bugs that are probably linked to changes in the brand new JDK 1.5.0_02. I think I manged to fix one problem but have another problem (see 2 below) that I hope someone can help with. The ant task f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-03-30 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33882 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-30 15:19 --- Seems to me that eliminating the fork=false option before it gets used is the simplest. The hit in start time is noise given how slow apt is, and the savings in stability worthwhile. thanks f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-03-28 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33882 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-28 05:22 --- Created an attachment (id=14576) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14576&action=view) Test case for failure Hi folks, Apparently apt only works in non-forked mode

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-03-10 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33882 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-10 11:19 --- I should add that this looks like a problem too [apt] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sun/mirror/apt/AnnotationProcessorFactory as if tools.jar is not being found, from another class

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-03-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-03-10 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33882 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-10 05:15 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Have you tried Firstly it is factoryPathRef so .. Output .. [apt] An exception has occurred in apt (1.5.0_01). Please file a b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-03-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2005-03-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-03-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2005-03-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/apt - New directory

2005-03-09 Thread stevel
stevel 2005/03/09 14:51:55 ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/apt - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-03-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] New: - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

2005-03-07 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33882 Summary: Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag Product: Ant Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly) Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

More apt

2005-03-07 Thread Steve Loughran
1. Apt is built with Make :) http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5012341 2. has some problems with return codes http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6223857 3. I told them to stop moving things on the bugrep where they are planning it, or at least tell us now and

Re: Apt

2005-03-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. what happens on debian systems where apt is an existing app? We > should bind the exe to java-home/bin/apt on forking execution We should be using JavaEnvUtils to get the path to apt, just like we do for javadoc or j

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33853] - Apt task does not call right method to compile

2005-03-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Apt

2005-03-07 Thread Steve Loughran
I am about to commit the fix for the latest bugrep regarding apt, and looking at the task in general 1. we clearly need tests for this. Has anyone done any Apt work that we can use as source samples 2. did apt.Main#compile move, or has it always been broken? It may be that a beta->rele

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-07 Thread Steve Loughran
Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: Steve Loughran wrote: But it would be nice for a java-apply, and perhaps a script-apply too. something that bulk executed a bit of inline script against files. I'm not offering to write it though; enough on my todo list. I will write it next time I need it. :-) . Las

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-07 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
Steve Loughran wrote: But it would be nice for a java-apply, and perhaps a script-apply too. something that bulk executed a bit of inline script against files. I'm not offering to write it though; enough on my todo list. I will write it next time I need it. :-) . Last time I just executed java

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-06 Thread Steve Loughran
Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: Is there with ? not yet. it was always avoided as we'd rather people do tasks with proper configuration, dependency and reuse. But it would be nice for a java-apply, and perhaps a script-apply too. something that bulk executed a bit of inline script against files. I'

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-06 Thread Steve Loughran
tTask being on the classpath and only declare your own apt (with the same name) when it is not there. I'd rather focus on getting 1.7 out the door, than backporting stuff to the 1.6 branch, but OSS gives you the right to do this yoursel

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-04 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
Is there with ? - Alexey. Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Jess Holle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Any hopes of a general purpose 'apt' (Java 5 annotation processor tool) task akin to 'javac', e.g. as an contrib-like add-on for Ant 1.6.x? I could really use this *now*.

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-04 Thread Jess Holle
Thanks. That did help. -- Jess Holle Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Jess Holle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Any hopes of a general purpose 'apt' (Java 5 annotation processor tool) task akin to 'javac', e.g. as an contrib-like add-on for Ant 1.6.x? I could really use thi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33853] - Apt task does not call right method to compile

2005-03-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33854] - Apt task does not call right method to compile

2005-03-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-04 Thread Jess Holle
g 1.7 without any problems. - Alexey. Jess Holle wrote: Any hopes of a general purpose 'apt' (Java 5 annotation processor tool) task akin to 'javac', e.g. as an contrib-like add-on for Ant 1.6.x? I could really use

RE: Apt Task

2005-03-04 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Jess Holle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Any hopes of a general purpose 'apt' (Java 5 annotation processor tool) > task akin to 'javac', e.g. as an contrib-like add-on for Ant 1.6.x? > > I could really use this *now*. In the mean time, why don&

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-04 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
If 1.7 ANT is better, run it now. We are running 1.7 without any problems. - Alexey. Jess Holle wrote: Any hopes of a general purpose 'apt' (Java 5 annotation processor tool) task akin to 'javac', e.g. as an contrib-like add-on for Ant 1.6.x? I could really use this

Apt Task

2005-03-04 Thread Jess Holle
Any hopes of a general purpose 'apt' (Java 5 annotation processor tool) task akin to 'javac', e.g. as an contrib-like add-on for Ant 1.6.x? I could really use this *now*. -- Jess Holle - To unsubscribe, e-ma

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33854] New: - Apt task does not call right method to compile

2005-03-04 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33854 Summary: Apt task does not call right method to compile Product: Ant Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly) Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33853] New: - Apt task does not call right method to compile

2005-03-04 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33853 Summary: Apt task does not call right method to compile Product: Ant Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly) Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32099] - apt task fork attribute should default to true

2005-02-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32099] - apt task fork attribute should default to true

2005-02-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32099] New: - apt task fork attribute should default to true

2004-11-07 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32099 apt task fork attribute should default to true Summary: apt task fork attribute should default to true Product: Ant Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly) Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-10-28 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 22:17 --- To add the above Apt task to ant1.6: 0. download and unzip the above attachment from 10/28/04 22:15 1. Install ant 1.6 2. Run ant to create the build/ant-a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-10-28 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 22:15 --- Created an attachment (id=13252) Project to create ant-apt.jar to add Apt task to Ant 1.6 - Zip

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-10-12 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 20:24 --- Created an attachment (id=13052) HTML file for inclusion in the ANT manual. The task list will need to be u

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-10-08 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-08 16:45 --- I have checked this in to CVS_HEAD. Now can we have some test cases please :) From anyone? Bruce, if you want to fork off a copy for your own projec

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-09-21 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-21 03:59 --- I don't think it matters whether it's verbose or short attribute names. I am not currently working on any test suites for this, as my need for

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-09-20 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-20 22:05 --- Great. do we go for terse (gensrcdir) or verbose (generatedsrcdir)? Next Questions... 1. Is anyone working on the tests, and javadocs or is that a job

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-09-20 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-20 13:55 --- It's called "preprocessdir" because the apt task spits out the following help: -s Specify where to place processor generated source

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-09-20 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-20 13:44 --- I like "gensrcdir" much better too. --DD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-09-20 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-20 04:41 --- Your name for the -s command line argument (i.e. preprocessdir) seems a little sub-optimal to me. Here is a section from apt's help s

Re: AW: APT Task

2004-08-06 Thread Steve Loughran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Obvious (to the IDE) bugs 1. AptCompilerAdapter doesnt build on java 1.5 source. I've fixed it: Enumeration enum = options.elements(); Checkstyle can find that: oops - I thought I had committed that. :) But the IllegalTokenText

AW: APT Task

2004-08-06 Thread Jan . Materne
> With the javadocs we can autogenerate the documentation. Like the proposals\xdocs shows. More can be done there (time ... :( > Without the tests, we will never know if the stuff works or > not until we ship, or catch regression tests. It´s a good feeling to know that your modifications would

Re: APT Task

2004-08-06 Thread Steve Loughran
Inger, Matthew wrote: I submitted an APT task a while back that will run the JDK 5.0 APT tool. I was wondering what the state of that submission was. I've seen no update to the bugzilla record in quite some time: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 I would think that a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-08-06 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-06 10:41 --- Created an attachment (id=12351) Updated version of the files; sun format rules, some code fixes, extracted messages for cross-referencing in

APT Task

2004-08-06 Thread Inger, Matthew
I submitted an APT task a while back that will run the JDK 5.0 APT tool. I was wondering what the state of that submission was. I've seen no update to the bugzilla record in quite some time: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 I would think that as JDK 5.0 approaches

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-22 19:16 --- Sorry for the confusion, I have learnt something again. Antoine - To unsubscribe,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-22 18:48 --- There might be a bit of confusion here Antoine ;-) Matt is talking about apt, the JDK 1.5 tool to process the new Annotation (Processing Tool). Apt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-22 18:30 --- Hello Matthew, Would your code not be better as a part of the apt distribution, which already includes ant tasks ? is this URL the reference concerni

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-07-19 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-19 14:19 --- Created an attachment (id=12158) .tar.gz file which contains new source code files. Please use this one, and not the previously submit

  1   2   >