Hi,
I have just modified the conversions to reflect the JDK 1.4 behavior.
Let me know if this raises other issues.
Regards,
Antoine
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> it may be that the conversion needs to be modifed to reflect the 1.4
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it may be that the conversion needs to be modifed to reflect the 1.4
> behaviour.
Agreed, even if it means a small scale break of backwards
compatibility. The behavior we see on JDK 1.3 has been there for any
JDK in earlier versions
ntly for these URI to File conversions between
versions.
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:08:00 +
Von: "Peter Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Ant Developers List"
Betreff: Re: FileUtilsTest jdk 1.3 vs 1.5
> On 11/13/06, Dom
On 11/13/06, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One could argue that a path without a drive letter is not absolute but
> relative and therefore the drive letter should not be inserted at all.
The assumption in ant for a long time is that "/x/y/z" is an absolute
file name, and thus
One could argue that a path without a drive letter is not absolute but
relative and therefore the drive letter should not be inserted at all.
I agree on principles, although I don't mind either way in practice, as
long as we document it accurately. --DD
-
Hi
On jdk 1.3 the test
testFromURI()
will fail because with jdk 1.3 no drive letter is inserted for a path
that does not contain a drive letter.
with jdk 1.5 the drive letter is inserted for a path that is "drive
absolute"
the fromURI method has javadoc claiming the following:
/**
* Co
