On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 21:50, Matt Benson wrote:
> Okay to stick with Java 5 for now, for the 1.9.x reason.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
Can JUnit 3 be removed? I believe JUnit 4 has Java 5 as a baseline.
Gintas
Okay to stick with Java 5 for now, for the 1.9.x reason.
Thanks,
Matt
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022, 9:09 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2022-02-09, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > Similarly to the question on Ivy, is there any compelling reason we
> should
> > continue to constrain this antlib to its current l
On 2022-02-09, Matt Benson wrote:
> Similarly to the question on Ivy, is there any compelling reason we should
> continue to constrain this antlib to its current level of Java (1.)5?
We still create Ant 1.9.x releases from time to time and 1.9.x would not
be able to use newer releases. Having sai
Similarly to the question on Ivy, is there any compelling reason we should
continue to constrain this antlib to its current level of Java (1.)5?
Matt
