You're right.
Initially in EasyAnt we wanted to find a way to define lifecycles. A
lifecycle is composed by a sequence of generic steps (what we've called
phase).
Then we could play with additional script (plugins) that can be bind to a
phase.
Again the idea was to make genericity in our build
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:03:45 +0100, Jean-Louis Boudart
jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote:
How about:
target-inteface name=foo/
target name=bar implements=foo/
/me run and hides!
2009/12/12 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:51:30 -0600, Dominique
On 2009-12-16, Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org wrote:
In EasyAnt there is already this notion of phase. But I see no real
conflict with not supporting target groups in Ant. EasyAnt could just
implement phases as targets, it would be just an implementation detail.
AFAIU EasyAnt uses
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:51:30 -0600, Dominique Devienne
ddevie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Xavier Hanin xavier.ha...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
and would do away with any notion of target composition people way
expect from the name
2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
On 2009-12-09, Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org wrote:
[...]
Now thinking loud, maybe a simple attribute on target like
dependencies=public would also fit ?
Likely coupled with changing the current target-group name.
Only
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Xavier Hanin xavier.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
and would do away with any notion of target composition people way
expect from the name target-*group*.
I also think the name target-group is confusing for something that
Xavier Hanin wrote:
2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
target name=foo dependencies=public/
target name=bar before-targets=foo/
and would do away with any notion of target composition people way
expect from the name target-*group*.
I also think the name target-group is
On 2009-12-09, Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org wrote:
Well, the title of this mail is referencing [1],
The short summary: it was discussed whether target-groups should be
allowed to contain tasks. I then mused whether we should do away with
target-group completely and make target's
Well, the title of this mail is referencing [1], as announced I was thinking
that we should, but after gathering my ideas and writing this email, I am not
so sure.
So was introduced lately the concept of target group in Ant. I found it quite
interesting as it would help writing sharable ant
