Hello Praful,
it is possible that some ant classes do not support multi-threaded
usage. You might want to be more specific.
Also, instead of using ant in process, you might want to kick off ant as
a separate process from your build server.
This way, you would not be hit by multi-threading/c
Hi,
I'm mailing only to say that Cristophe isn't alone. I have the same need
here, obtain the target "if" and unless conditions, but I do not have a way
to do this. I think that adding getters to Target is a great solution. How
can we suggest this modification to the API, to get it in the next rel
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Christophe Labouisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'm wondering if using the Ant API as I do to peek into a project
> is something which is ok albeit the API is currently lacking a few
> things or the API should not be used the way I do?
Your approach is fine, I'd say.
I'm
Jose Alberto Fernandez said:
> Notice that you really cannot rely on the tasks allowing you to peek
> at the information inside them. Remember that in principle ANT is a
> component
> framework and that more and more we spect ANT components to be provided
> by third parties. So you cannot count on
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think these getters arent there because we havent needed it
> :-) Only the target class itself uses these information so
> why putting them in? But if there is a need for having
> getters outside I don´t see an obstacle while adding the
I think these getters arent there because we havent needed it :-)
Only the target class itself uses these information so why putting them in?
But if there is a need for having getters outside I don´t see an obstacle
while
adding them ... the information are not unofficial ...
Do you need more?
J
The PDF looked great (it was the only document I tried)
Having your assistance with generating PDF from the proposal/xdocs
stuff would be great!
Erik
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 11:23 AM, Andrew Marlow wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to look at the work
I've done on the Ant manual yet?
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: RE: Using ANT API
> Has anyone had a chance to look at the work
> I've done on the Ant manual yet? See
>
> http://ww
Has anyone had a chance to look at the work
I've done on the Ant manual yet? See
http://www.marlowa.plus.com/ant.html
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
There is an emerald here the size of a plover's egg!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:54:40PM +0800, Navanee wrote:
> Hello,
>
> That is useful only when we run single task with ANT API. But I have to
> do many tasks (cvs - checkout, compilation, copy, delete, compare, cvs -
> commit), that?s y I'm looking for sample code to create a project,
> several
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Using ANT API
I gave you an answer on http://www.jguru.com/forums/view.jsp?EID=1064654
and
http://www.jguru.com/forums/view.jsp?EID=1101483 and got no reply to
I gave you an answer on http://www.jguru.com/forums/view.jsp?EID=1064654 and
http://www.jguru.com/forums/view.jsp?EID=1101483 and got no reply to that.
Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: Navanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:56 am, Mirko Raner wrote:
> (a) Is there something I am missing in the Ant API that would allow me
> to create a build.xml file from an initialized Project object?
Sort of. You need to checkout the RuntimeConfigurable. It is a DOM of sorts
that is maintained by Ant. You shou
13 matches
Mail list logo
