Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Okay, how's this?
That is good, I have committed it.
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure it is good advice to tell people to recompile ant, in
> > the (already alarming) error message that most ant newbies see.
>
> I agree. The statement should be conditional in that it says "look
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure it is good advice to tell people to recompile ant, in
> > the (already alarming) error message that most ant newbies see.
>
> I agree. The statement should be conditional in that it says "look
Peter Reilly wrote:
> I am not sure it is good advice to tell people to recompile
> ant, in the (already alarming) error message that most ant newbies see.
>
> Normally people will get ant precomiled - to get all the optional
> tasks compiled correcty is difficult.
You may well be correct. I was
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not sure it is good advice to tell people to recompile ant, in
the (already alarming) error message that most ant newbies see.
I agree. The statement should be conditional in that it says "look
whether it act
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure it is good advice to tell people to recompile ant, in
> the (already alarming) error message that most ant newbies see.
I agree. The statement should be conditional in that it says "look
whether it actually conatins som
I am not sure it is good advice to tell people to recompile
ant, in the (already alarming) error message that most ant newbies see.
Normally people will get ant precomiled - to get all the optional
tasks compiled correcty is difficult.
Peter
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
This diff corrects an outdated error
