On 17 Mar 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Modernize Jikes (unconditionally) - PR 25868 and 26404
the next Kaffe Gump run should tell us if something went wrong.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
Does this need to be done for other forked tasks - junit, java for example?
Petet
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 10 Dec 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+// this is a quick hack to make things work in a
+// Gump/Kaffe/Jikes combo. I promise I'll explain it later -
+// and add a r
On 10 Dec 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+// this is a quick hack to make things work in a
+// Gump/Kaffe/Jikes combo. I promise I'll explain it later -
+// and add a real solution as well
This is the first part of the promise.
Gump currently places Xerces and various
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't we at least log some kind of warning when we ignore 1.1 or
> 1.2?
+1
will change it.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
Hi
if (attributes.getSource() != null) {
cmd.createArgument().setValue("-source");
-cmd.createArgument().setValue(attributes.getSource());
+String source = attributes.getSource();
+if (source.equals("1.1") || source.equals("1.2")) {
+
