On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems to me however the current LoaderUtil more has somewhat of a
jdk-version match-up function?
It used to be used for that, yes. But this part of its functionality
is no longer needed in Ant 1.6 as we've dropped JDK 1.1
Message-
From: Marc Portier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 1:32 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: having datatypes load classes
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant
We already have LoaderUtil in the util subpackage. Might fit there.
I started on PathUtil for the moment, all is static so could be
injected easily, seems to me however the current LoaderUtil more
has somewhat of a jdk-version match-up function?
- public ClassLoader
Provided patch under bugzilla 18906
- ended up being ClasspathUtil.java
- added the newInstance idea as well
I need to get on with the show first now, but like to refactor
other parts of ant where similar cut/paste code might be
lingering (for sure o.a.t.a.taskdefs.Definer is candidate)
Hope to
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant iteself, I was
hoping for some reuse here
One would think so, but the truth is that you'll find copy-paste reuse
in this area instead of delegation or something.
Patches for a
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant iteself, I was
hoping for some reuse here
One would think so, but the truth is that you'll find copy-paste reuse
in this area instead of delegation or
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 1:32 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: having datatypes load classes
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant iteself, I was
hoping for some
See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-devm=104870800508326w=2
And http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17199
I prefer the first link, since I'm the author of it, but the second link
addresses the same issue. If your xmlfilter elements do not need any
configurations though, it may
