I'm having trouble envisioning a use case were nested declarations are
more valuable or intuitive than the existing methodology that others have
already pointed out. Can you enlighten us as to situations where you found
a nested approach to be more desirable than the standard methodology,
besid
--- Tony Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
> > Why not simply
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ?
> >
> > -Matt
> >
>
> That works fine. But in certain situations I've
> really wanted to be
> able to nest them.
>
> It seems intuitive to nest them; XML is
> hierarchical, as are
> d
Matt Benson wrote:
> Why not simply
>
>
>
>
> ?
>
> -Matt
>
That works fine. But in certain situations I've really wanted to be
able to nest them.
It seems intuitive to nest them; XML is hierarchical, as are
directories. Why not mirror the hierarchy?
-- Tony
--- Tony Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, has there been any work done
> towards making the
> task nest-able?
>
> For example:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Which would create:
>
>
> --- + dir
> | - subdir
> | + another_subdir
