On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the rationale for why references can be
> overridden? This seems to contrast sharply with the
> treatment of properties.
I'm not sure I'll get all historical details right without browsing
through my archives, but let me try:
I have a few questions:
What's the rationale for why references can be
overridden? This seems to contrast sharply with the
treatment of properties.
With , are the contents inserted "conceptually
in-line" in the build file? I ask this because when I
declare that contains a particular reference,
