Bug report for Ant [2003/10/26]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24122] - Other Compilers

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Question about MacroDef vs antcall

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:18 am, Steve Cohen wrote: > The new ant features wiki > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?NewAntFeaturesInDetail/MacroDe >f > > says: > > "If you are using as a macro substitute, you really should look > into this task. It is not only going to simplify your buil

Tale from the front: macrodef nesting

I am now trying to experiment with some of the new features of ant 1.6. Here's a real-world example of the difficulties of trying to replace antcalls with macrodefs. Given the following definitions, notice that I am trying to nest a call to the macrodef make.precompiled.web.xml inside a call to

RE: Question about MacroDef vs antcall

Thanks for the information on depends vs. antcall. My suspicion has been that antcall was a major cause of delay. Unnecessary operations are another area of optimization potential. -Original Message- From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 10/26/2003 4:21 PM To: