Re: Open source ivy files project?

2008-04-16 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 16/04/2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Maven has naming conventions [1], [2]. > > > > > > The problem is that t

Is our objective for 2.0 too ambitious? (was Re: Ivy 2.0 planning)

2008-04-16 Thread Xavier Hanin
More than one month ago we agreed to focus on bug fixing for 2.0 final (see my original mail below). At that time we had about 80+ issues targeted at 2.0. Since then it seems we have fixed 57 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310580&fixfor=12313012

Re: Is our objective for 2.0 too ambitious?

2008-04-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, what do you think? Shall we reconsider our objective for 2.0, > and retarget some of the issues for a 2.0.x? Comments from the peanut gallery: There are certain categories of bugs that you can't really re-target, those that would

Re: Is our objective for 2.0 too ambitious?

2008-04-16 Thread Gilles Scokart
On 16/04/2008, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, what do you think? Shall we reconsider our objective for 2.0, > > and retarget some of the issues for a 2.0.x? > > Comments from the peanut gallery: > > There are ce

Re: Open source ivy files project?

2008-04-16 Thread Archie Cobbs
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The link gives a 404, so I can only say what I think of the patch you > attached in your last e-mail. IMO, the patch quality is good overall. The patch has been updated a few times since I sent that email. New patch is h

Re: Open source ivy files project?

2008-04-16 Thread Archie Cobbs
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we at least need to avoid having the same inconsistencies in names > from the beginning. Having clear rules for module names and orgs (like > following the package name convention) is the only way to avoid the > p

Upgrading the version of IvyDE

2008-04-16 Thread Nicolas Lalevée
Hi, I would like to upgrade the version of IvyDE to 2.0. The trunk version is currently tagged to be an 1.3. I would like to make this upgrade for sevral reasons: - the trunk version of IvyDE is relying on Ivy 2 whereas the last released version of IvyDE (1.2.1) is using Ivy 1.4.1. From a user

Re: Upgrading the version of IvyDE

2008-04-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to upgrade the version of IvyDE to 2.0. The trunk > version is currently tagged to be an 1.3. > > I would like to make this upgrade for sevral reasons: > - the trunk version of IvyDE is relying on Ivy 2 whereas the last

Re: Upgrading the version of IvyDE

2008-04-16 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Nicolas Lalevée < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to upgrade the version of IvyDE to 2.0. The trunk version is > currently tagged to be an 1.3. I would like to make this upgrade for > sevral > reasons: > - the trunk version of IvyDE is relying on I

Re: Open source ivy files project?

2008-04-16 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > The link gives a 404, so I can only say what I think of the patch you > > attached in your last e-mail. IMO, the patch quality is good overal

Re: Open source ivy files project?

2008-04-16 Thread Archie Cobbs
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Maven has naming conventions [1], [2]. > > > > The problem is that those conventions apeared with maven 2. maven 1 > > didn't had this and t

Re: Upgrading the version of IvyDE

2008-04-16 Thread Bruce Atherton
+1. What Stefan said. Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to upgrade the version of IvyDE to 2.0. The trunk version is currently tagged to be an 1.3. I would like to make this upgrade for sevral reasons: - the trunk version of

Re: Is our objective for 2.0 too ambitious? (was Re: Ivy 2.0 planning)

2008-04-16 Thread Bruce Atherton
I think you have to accept that there will be bugs. After all, would you halt the whole release if a minor bug was found the day before it was due to be published? But there are different categories of bugs. Some are so serious that you don't want to roll a release with it no matter what. This

Re: Open source ivy files project?

2008-04-16 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Maven has naming conventions [1], [2]. > > > > > > The pr

Re: Is our objective for 2.0 too ambitious? (was Re: Ivy 2.0 planning)

2008-04-16 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Bruce Atherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you have to accept that there will be bugs. After all, would you > halt the whole release if a minor bug was found the day before it was due to > be published? > > But there are different categories of bugs. Some