Bug report for Ant [2018/02/18]

2018-02-17 Thread bugzilla
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID   |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
| |   +-+
| |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=Critical  REG=Regression  MAJ=Major   |
| |   |   MIN=Minor   NOR=NormalENH=Enhancement TRV=Trivial |
| |   |   +-+
| |   |   | Date Posted |
| |   |   |  +--+
| |   |   |  | Description  |
| |   |   |  |  |
| 5003|Opn|Blk|2001-11-21|exec task does not return after executed command f|
| 6606|Opn|Enh|2002-02-21|META-BUG problems with delegating classloaders|
| 7552|Opn|Cri|2002-03-28|Invalid task cache in targets |
| 7712|New|Enh|2002-04-03|Provide patternset support for VSSGET task?   |
| 8294|New|Enh|2002-04-19|: Allow  and  to app|
| 8866|New|Enh|2002-05-07|Signal handling in java task  |
| 8895|New|Enh|2002-05-08|ant and/or antcall should support forking |
| 8972|New|Enh|2002-05-10|allow property expansion in  property v|
| 8981|New|Enh|2002-05-10|Tar task command additional features  |
| 9294|New|Enh|2002-05-21|[PATCH] optional/j2ee/ServerDeploy OC4J Support   |
| 9995|Ass|Enh|2002-06-19|MKS Source Integrity tasks|
|10020|New|Enh|2002-06-19|'s dependency behaviour should be more con|
|10231|New|Enh|2002-06-25|Need access to current file in SQLExec|
|10283|New|Enh|2002-06-27|Add a destfile to the uptodate task   |
|10402|New|Enh|2002-07-02|adding the ability of html like whitespace preserv|
|3|New|Enh|2002-07-24|keytool task  |
|11560|Opn|Enh|2002-08-08|Taskdef does not apply reverseLoader policy on sta|
|12267|New|Enh|2002-09-03|Add ability to unzip into separate folders|
|12292|New|Enh|2002-09-04|[PATCH] enable  tag inside tar|
|12334|New|Enh|2002-09-05|REQUEST: Ant task doesn't allow attachment of a bu|
|12518|New|Enh|2002-09-11|Gunzip & BUnZip2 add filesets, patternsets, and ov|
|12765|New|Enh|2002-09-18|"rmdir" and "deltree" patches for ftp task enhance|
|12964|New|Enh|2002-09-24|ANTLR only takes one input file at a time |
|13047|Inf|Enh|2002-09-26|Support for  and  on O|
|13371|New|Enh|2002-10-07|[PATCH] Contributed new CvsExportDiff task|
|13847|New|Nor|2002-10-22|pvcs task: wrong option (-r) specified for get (sh|
|13934|New|Enh|2002-10-24|Translate task shouldn't load default locale prope|
|13939|New|Enh|2002-10-24|Translate task should have better key matching cap|
|14320|New|Enh|2002-11-06|copy fileset followsymlinks="false" does not copy |
|14393|New|Enh|2002-11-08|Support use of jndi within ant|
|14512|New|Enh|2002-11-13|Allow creating database connection similar to 

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

2018-02-17 Thread Jaikiran Pai

On 17/02/18 12:51 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:

On 2018-02-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote:


I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this
task. I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this
task and it can be currently found here[2]. I would suggest reading
the manual first, before reviewing the PR, since the manual will give
an overall idea of what's being attempted with this task.

It may be a while until I manage to look at it - in particular since I
need to "read the manual first" :-)
Please take your time. Although I am happy with the way this task has 
shaped up, the one area I would like to have your feedback is the 
sysout/syserr handling implementation in that PR. The intention is to 
try and avoid potential OOMs and other such issues, that have been noted 
in our bug tracker, but at the same time I don't want to end up having 
an overly complicated logic or something that could have been done 
better in a different way.


Whether we want to include
the new task with an upcoming release depends on how comfortable you
feel with it from my point of view. It probably won't see much use
unless we include it in a release.



Given the changes, I am confident that it won't break existing tasks or 
anything else in Ant. I also believe that this new task will help people 
get started with using JUnit 5 with Ant to an extent that they can get 
the tests run (both JUnit 4 and 5) with basic reporting features and the 
ability to use the junitreport for the generated XML reports. So I think 
it's in a good enough state to start off with. I do plan to try this 
task as a "user" myself this weekend, outside of our testsuite and see 
if there are any issues or anything basic missing.


-Jaikiran

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org