On Wed, 21 May 2003 03:29 am, Steve Loughran wrote:
+1, with couple of questions
-I'm unsure about the point that Active PMC members have the binding vote
for committers -to date its been open to all committers to have binding
votes. Is there a reason for the change?
The PMC role is to do
On Wed, 21 May 2003 05:30 am, Bruce Atherton wrote:
+1 assuming the typos are fixed. I'd go in and fix them, but I'm not sure
whether that might affect the vote.
No, fixing typos wouldn't affect the vote, so please go ahead and fix them :-)
Thanks
Conor
Status Report for the Ant project
o Ant 1.5.2
Ant 1.5.2 was released on March 3, 2003
The zip refactoring that was undertaken to eliminate a number of zip/jar
update bugs introduced a regression whereby some elements of the produced
Zips could not be viewed by WinZIP. This required a followup
PMC members,
I'd like to move towards adoption of the bylaws draft.
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ant/proposal/ant-site
/anakia/docs/bylaws.html?rev=1.16
Could you please view this and vote indicating your position. If
you wish to
vote -1 because you don't believe the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20093.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bruce 2003/05/20 23:08:58
Modified:proposal/ant-site/anakia/docs bylaws.html
proposal/ant-site/anakia/xdocs bylaws.xml
Log:
Fixed typos and made capitalization more consistent
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +19 -19
bodewig 2003/05/20 23:34:39
Modified:docs/manual/Integration VAJAntTool.html
Log:
spam-protect Francois Rey per his request
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/Integration/VAJAntTool.html
Index: VAJAntTool.html
bodewig 2003/05/20 23:37:06
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Javadoc.java
Log:
Fix self assignment - PR: 19288 - Submitted by: Thierry Lach
Revision ChangesPath
1.115 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javadoc.java
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19288.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20079.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
antoine 2003/05/21 00:16:29
ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/subant - New directory
On Mon, 19 May 2003, peter reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) are build script authors allowed to specify arbitary
URIs for ant type definitions?
I do not think this is a good idea.
I've seen that Costin and Conor prefer that antlibs specify their URI
themselves. Could anybody please
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18391.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wednesday 21 May 2003 08:21, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2003, peter reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) are build script authors allowed to specify arbitary
URIs for ant type definitions?
I do not think this is a good idea.
I've seen that Costin and Conor prefer that
Here is a simple example task:
import java.util.*;
import org.apache.tools.ant.DynamicConfigurator;
import org.apache.tools.ant.Task;
public class Dy
extends Task
implements DynamicConfigurator
{
private String subName;
private Map attributes = new HashMap();
private List
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20103.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I have prepared a few days ago some html pages located under
http://ant.apache.org/projects/antlib/index.html
They might be interesting if you want to read more about the proposal of Jose
Alberto Fernandez.
These pages do not explain yet the proposal of Peter Reilly due to the fact
that I had
There's one thing I don't like, the Adoption of New Codebase part
under Actions.
As the text is it reads (at least I read it that way) as if Rules for
Revolutionaries were the only possible way to adopt a new code base.
Apart from the fact that I personally don't like RfR too much, I think
that
bodewig 2003/05/21 03:09:11
Modified:docs external.html
xdocsexternal.xml
Log:
Add pointer to CMSDeploy.
Submitted by: Maso Gato rgato at soluziona dot com
Revision ChangesPath
1.116 +49 -0 ant/docs/external.html
Index:
From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 21 May 2003 06:58 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
I still think that the roles concept is good and I would
like to make a
separate proposal for roles. My idea would be along the
following lines,
supposing that ant is being used
Antoine,
Great job, I think you have sumarized alot of the discussion quite well.
Thanks,
Jose Alberto
-Original Message-
From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 May 2003 09:58
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: antlib
I have prepared a few days ago some
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20110.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, 21 May 2003 08:31 pm, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
Well I have to say you are mistaken, in my proposal the task (container)
implemented the addConfigured(InterfaceRole) method. The interface was
for the thing being passed (the child element, after possibly some
adaptor).
Well I am
On Wed, 21 May 2003 04:19 pm, Bruce Atherton wrote:
Ok, done.
Great - thanks.
But in proofing the document I realized there was another issue that may be
a significant typo or may just require a bit more editing.
The responsibilities section says this:
The PMC may consider the position
conor 2003/05/21 05:23:36
Modified:proposal/ant-site/anakia/docs bylaws.html
proposal/ant-site/anakia/xdocs bylaws.xml
Log:
Update proposal to remove RfR and add subproject creation clause
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +106 -103
On Wed, 21 May 2003 07:41 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Do we need to refer to RfR at all?
No. Actually I don't like RfR either. I've removed it and added a snippet to
cover new sub-project creation here too. Refer to the recent commit and let
me know what you think. Should the latter be
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Refer to the recent commit and let me know what you think.
I've already done so 8-)
+1 on the bylaws as they are right now.
Should the latter be restricted to PMC members?
Proposal of subprojects should not be restricted to PMC
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19953.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20020.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2003/05/21 06:29:55
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional ANTLR.java
Log:
What has been -traceTreeWalker in ANTLR 2.7.0 has become
-traceTreeParser in 2.7.2
PR: 20020
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +25 -4
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20020.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: antlib
On Wed, 21 May 2003 08:31 pm, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
Well I have to say you are mistaken, in my proposal the task
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2003, peter reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) are build script authors allowed to specify arbitary
URIs for ant type definitions?
I do not think this is a good idea.
I've seen that Costin and Conor prefer that antlibs specify their URI
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20085.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20119.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20119.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20103.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20103.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20103.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20128.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Costin Manolache wrote:
That's consistent with most of the current uses of XML namespaces - you
don't see users picking their favorite XHTML or XSLT namespace URI.
To elaborate on this: the original intention of namespaces
was to provide universal names for elements. This means
a:section
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20103.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've taken a first stab at adding support for nested xmlcatalog
elements within ejbjar, but I'm running into some problems I thought
I'd run by the list.
First glance, it appeared pretty easy. Add a few methods and insert
the following bit of code in the execute method:
if (xmlCatalog != null)
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
currently chmod has a fair number of additional features.
Which are?
dir, includes, excludes, defaultexcludes...
chmod supports these with it's own internal fileset. I could duplicate
it into my AbstractAccessTask (I think) to produce a similar effect in
my tasks, but I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
47 matches
Mail list logo
