cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html

2004-04-27 Thread jhm
jhm 2004/04/26 22:14:40 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html Log: Missing '' in @text-example. Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +2 -2 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/macrodef.html Index: macrodef.html

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html

2004-04-27 Thread jhm
jhm 2004/04/26 22:16:51 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH macrodef.html Log: Merge: Missing '' in @text-example. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.2.2.17 +2 -2

RE: [Container|Composite]Mapper

2004-04-27 Thread Jan . Materne
Ps. Thanks for updating the doc for macrodef, esp the text element!. Actually, that was all Jan's work. I just noticed a missing e on the word attribut and thought I'd fix it... Ok, Then thanks Jan! Peter Sorry, it wasn´t me :-) As the changelog [1] shows I added

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java

2004-04-27 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2004/04/27 00:44:48 Modified:.WHATSNEW build.xml docs/manual/OptionalTasks junit.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java Log: forkstyle - forkmode Revision ChangesPath

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24697] - The JUnit plugin forks once for each test suite

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24697. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks junit.html

2004-04-27 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2004/04/27 00:45:34 Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks junit.html Log: @since Revision ChangesPath 1.36 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks/junit.html Index: junit.html === RCS

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java

2004-04-27 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2004/04/27 00:45:48 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW build.xml docs/manual/OptionalTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH junit.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH JUnitTask.java

[Ant Wiki] Updated: Proposals

2004-04-27 Thread ant-cvs
Date: 2004-04-27T02:34:53 Editor: 194.213.87.193 Wiki: Ant Wiki Page: Proposals URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Proposals no comment Change Log: -- @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ * Being able to view the manual

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28614] - backslash is removed from filter token value

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28614. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28620] New: - Allow a final task to be performed

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28620. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

use of canonical in import

2004-04-27 Thread Peter Reilly
Jesse has found a problem with the use of import in a modular build system - in netbeans. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28505 Basicly the issue is whether to canonicalize the imported file name or to use the absolute path. Jesse makes a good point for using the absolute path.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28621] New: - Enhancement of InputRequest class

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28621. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28620] - Allow a final task to be performed

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28620. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17973] - A final target just like a init target

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17973. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: use of canonical in import

2004-04-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Basicly the issue is whether to canonicalize the imported file name or to use the absolute path. Jesse makes a good point for using the absolute path. The problem is that this is a incompatible change. Yep, he found similar problems

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28565. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28565. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28624] New: - about using ant.bat in exec

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28624. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28624] - about using ant.bat in exec

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28624. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28565. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: use of canonical in import

2004-04-27 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
+1 from me too. -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 April 2004 13:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: use of canonical in import On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Basicly the issue is whether to canonicalize

RE: [Container|Composite]Mapper

2004-04-27 Thread Matt Benson
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, it wasn´t me :-) As the changelog [1] shows I added only the last example (use of @attributes inside attribute (1.14). The text comes from Matt (1.16). I still don't remember doing that, but it's in the log... oh well! -Matt

RE: [Container|Composite]Mapper

2004-04-27 Thread Jan . Materne
I still don't remember doing that, but it's in the log... oh well! So much done? :-) Most important is THAT it´s there. Minor important is WHO has done it. Jan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28565. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

2004-04-27 Thread mbenson
mbenson 2004/04/27 08:23:25 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java Log: Close process streams in waitFor(Process). PR: 28565 Revision ChangesPath 1.78 +8 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Execute.java Index: Execute.java

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

2004-04-27 Thread mbenson
mbenson 2004/04/27 08:24:46 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java Log: Fix typo. Revision ChangesPath 1.79 +2 -2 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Execute.java Index: Execute.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28565. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

2004-04-27 Thread mbenson
mbenson 2004/04/27 08:30:56 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java Log: More typo corrections (not mine). Revision ChangesPath 1.80 +3 -3 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Execute.java Index: Execute.java

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

2004-04-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 27 Apr 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: } catch (InterruptedException e) { process.destroy(); +} finally { +try { +process.getInputStream().close(); +process.getOutputStream().close(); +

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

2004-04-27 Thread Peter Reilly
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 27 Apr 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: } catch (InterruptedException e) { process.destroy(); +} finally { +try { +process.getInputStream().close(); +process.getOutputStream().close(); +

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28565. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

2004-04-27 Thread Matt Benson
--- Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: Is it save to call getXYZStream on a Process instance after it has terminated or even been destroyed? I've never tried it and the Javadocs don't say anything. Stefan: The test cases all pass. I imagine this is okay.

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

2004-04-27 Thread mbenson
mbenson 2004/04/27 11:14:54 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java Log: Move Process stream closure into a new public static method, closeStreams(Process). PR: 28565 Revision ChangesPath 1.81 +21 -8

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

2004-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28565. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[Ant Wiki] Updated: AntTasks

2004-04-27 Thread ant-cvs
Date: 2004-04-27T12:42:19 Editor: 208.254.132.131 Wiki: Ant Wiki Page: AntTasks URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/AntTasks no comment Change Log: -- @@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ There is a great deal of folklore