[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-13 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 I intended it for 1.9.x in particular. I will open a new request for master later (with commons-net 3.6, for example). --- - To

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-13 Thread bodewig
Github user bodewig commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Thanks, looks good to me. Unless you want to port it to the 1.9.x branch you don't need to care about Java5 compatibility. ---

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Ant-Build-Matrix-1.9.x-Linux » JDK 1.6 (latest) #134

2017-12-13 Thread Jaikiran Pai
It's back to normal [1], so the crash seems to be specific to certain nodes on Jenkins, for Java 6. I don't plan to look more into this. [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-1.9.x-Linux/jdk=JDK%201.6%20(latest)/135/ -Jaikiran On 13/12/17 8:40 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: So we

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/13/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/7/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/12/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/6/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer Maven Ant tasks

2017-12-13 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 I reviewed third party libraries that could be updated; the documentation could be more emphatic about jspc being deprecated. --- -

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer Maven Ant tasks

2017-12-13 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 SLF4J was written by the [author of Log4j](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log4j) who wrote [an article](https://articles.qos.ch/classloader.html) cataloguing the problems with Commons Logging. When

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer Maven Ant tasks

2017-12-13 Thread bodewig
Github user bodewig commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Actually I do not agree with the slf4j change ;-) What problem are you trying to solve? To me both existing logging backends are legacy and we maintain them for people who want to use them -

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer Maven Ant tasks

2017-12-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/11/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer Maven Ant tasks

2017-12-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/5/ ---

Re: Github ant repo now integrated with Jenkins for pull request testing

2017-12-13 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 12/12/17 8:05 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: The next few days, I'll probably try and see if I can get a Linux based job to run alongside this Windows job for PRs. We now have a Linux one too for the PRs https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/. It has the same characteristics as

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer Maven Ant tasks

2017-12-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/10/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer Maven Ant tasks

2017-12-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/4/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer Maven Ant tasks

2017-12-13 Thread bodewig
Github user bodewig commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 I don't really think you need a PR - I've upgraded BCEL last week and did so directly. Ant tends to use a "commit then review" model where people look at the commits and things get amended later. ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer Maven Ant tasks

2017-12-13 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 I updated WHATSNEW and added a replacement for all legacy logging frameworks. There are more potential updates: Java Mail API, Rhino, Jasper; perhaps they deserve a separate PR? ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer Maven Ant tasks

2017-12-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/9/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer Maven Ant tasks

2017-12-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/3/ ---

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Ant-Build-Matrix-1.9.x-Linux » JDK 1.6 (latest) #134

2017-12-13 Thread Jaikiran Pai
So we have now had 2 runs of this job failing with a JVM crash: Run 133 [exec] [au:antunit] Build File: [exec] [au:antunit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors:

[GitHub] ant issue #51: [master] Changes for BZ-19516

2017-12-13 Thread jaikiran
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51 Thanks for reviewing. Merged to master branch. Will backport it to 1.9.x too. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] ant pull request #51: [master] Changes for BZ-19516

2017-12-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

[GitHub] ant issue #51: [master] Changes for BZ-19516

2017-12-13 Thread bodewig
Github user bodewig commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51 Looks good to me. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Build Script Templates

2017-12-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2017-12-12, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > What I came up with, instead, was a set of conventions, which closely > resemble the Maven projects, and a "Maven Jar Template" (MJT). The MJT > is an Ant build script, which is generic, and shared by all our > subprojects. The actual build scripts