Re: Ant test failures on Java 9

2018-02-28 Thread Jaikiran Pai
I just tried locally both with Java 8 and 9: java version "9.0.1" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode) They pass for me: [au:antunit] Tests run: 26, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.175 sec [au:antunit] Target:

Ant test failures on Java 9

2018-02-28 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
I see following in my builds against master Build File: .../src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/copy-test.xml Tests run: 26, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Time elapsed: 8,59 sec ... Target: test-with-some-resources-mapped-away caused an ERROR at line 471, column 29 Message: Can't copy a resource

[GitHub] ant-ivyde issue #7: Fix IVYDE-386

2018-02-28 Thread jaikiran
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/pull/7 @jonl-percsolutions-com Thank you for reporting the issue and then raising this PR. I looked at the changes in this PR and it looks like this change will silently ignore items that aren't of type

[GitHub] ant-ivyde pull request #8: IVYDE-386 Fix ClassCastException

2018-02-28 Thread jaikiran
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/pull/8 IVYDE-386 Fix ClassCastException This should fix the ClassCastException reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVYDE-386 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by

Ant documentation

2018-02-28 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
I made an attempt to convert the manual to HTML 5, the rationale being that HTML 5 deprecates tt tag and recommends to replace it with tags like code, kbd, samp and var, which could be used in a more consistent way to achieve something closer to a semantic markup. I tried then to use the

[GitHub] ant-ivyde issue #7: Fix IVYDE-386

2018-02-28 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/pull/7 Sorry about a loose remark and for pursuing the deprecations [overagressively](https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/commit/d2983ea950fc93daa2db8bb6ef17958450fd34e3). What I would appreciate is

[GitHub] ant-ivyde issue #7: Fix IVYDE-386

2018-02-28 Thread jaikiran
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/pull/7 >> There is a regression in URLHandler to be dealt with Actually, that's not a regression. It's a fix to a regression that I introduced in one of the snapshots. 2.4.x had `openStream`

[GitHub] ant-ivyde issue #7: Fix IVYDE-386

2018-02-28 Thread jonl-percsolutions-com
Github user jonl-percsolutions-com commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/pull/7 I believe I did it correctly and it is now rebased. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org

[GitHub] ant-ivyde issue #7: Fix IVYDE-386

2018-02-28 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/pull/7 Could you please rebase on the latest master? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional

Re: svn commit: r1825596 - /ant/site/ant/build.xml

2018-02-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-02-28, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > @Stefan: You added the 1.9 manual. Do you think we could upate the > manuals this way? The online manual also contains the javadocs, these ate not present in the git repo. I simply extracted the manual archive of the distribution artifact. Stefan

[GitHub] ant-ivyde issue #7: Fix IVYDE-386

2018-02-28 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/pull/7 There is a [regression](https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/commit/ae27582d1ba0cb6c2b18d30a81cb1b82033069c3) in URLHandler to be dealt with ``` [pde-build] [javac] schemaStream =

AW: svn commit: r1825596 - /ant/site/ant/build.xml

2018-02-28 Thread jhm
@Stefan: You added the 1.9 manual. Do you think we could upate the manuals this way? Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Log: > new target for updating the (online)manual from Ant's git-repo > > Modified: ant/site/ant/build.xml > URL: >

AW: Future of SVN repos

2018-02-28 Thread jhm
Thanks for the reminder, Matt. So we could stay on ASF infrastructure. https://selfserve.apache.org/ but for git repos https://gitbox.apache.org/ Both forms require PMC-name, repo-name, repo-description, commit-notification-list and github-notification list. But while (for me) the

Re: Future of SVN repos

2018-02-28 Thread Matt Sicker
Creating new git repos on apache is self-serve, so it's just as easy as GitHub really (though you need to be a PMC member I think). On 28 February 2018 at 12:48, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > > > If we want to migrate the site repo, we should also think about > > > handling the

Future of SVN repos

2018-02-28 Thread jhm
> > If we want to migrate the site repo, we should also think about > > handling the sandbox. > > I think we just never migrated it because it simply wasn't used. Using > a single git repository for several unrelated experiments doesn't sound > very git-like. Yep. We could migrate site to git

[GitHub] ant-ivyde pull request #7: Fix IVYDE-386

2018-02-28 Thread jonl-percsolutions-com
GitHub user jonl-percsolutions-com opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/pull/7 Fix IVYDE-386 According to Eclipse documentation, IContributionItem can, in no way, be relied on to be a MenuManager and in Eclipse Oxygen, this code is causing an exception as

Re: ant-ivy git commit: initial WIP version of release instructions to follow for releasing Ivy

2018-02-28 Thread Jaikiran Pai
I read through it and (obviously) it covers the necessary details. So my new doc that I committed isn't needed. As for automating/changing things in that doc, I think it's something one of us can do once we try out that doc for this release. -Jaikiran On 27/02/18 8:12 PM, Jaikiran Pai

Re: committer += gintas

2018-02-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-02-28, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > - build, inactive repo, last change 2007, not used any more (I think) I don't even recall what it was :-) > If we want to migrate the site repo, we should also think about > handling the sandbox. I think we just never migrated it because it simply

Re: AW: committer += gintas

2018-02-28 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
What I meant is that there are more changes that I've queued up (check out the fresh revision of Ant manual ;-) Gintas Den 28 feb. 2018 08:58 skrev "Jan Matèrne (jhm)" : > It seems that having the site in git is possible [1]: > - have your site in a git repo > - open a INFRA

Re: Ant 1.9.10 and Ivy

2018-02-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-02-28, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >> I'll grep through the sources and revert all changes to clone >> signatures unless anybody else beats me to it. > Done > https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/2e788849136bfd75e88ce0d959810f1191d43a33 Thanks Stefan