+1.
Verified that the changes in the junitlauncher task documentation are
present. Also ran some local projects with this new 1.10.3 tar.gz and
all was fine.
-Jaikiran
On 24/03/18 6:18 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a new release candidate for 1.10.3 incorporating the doc
Github user asfgit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/54
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/54/
---
Github user asfgit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/54
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/48/
---
I asked sbt developers [1] whether they would like to use the same Git
repo. The consensus seems to be that sbt would like to have their own
branch (or two). Would it be acceptable to graft sbt branch(es) to Ivy repo?
Gintas
[1] https://github.com/sbt/ivy/issues/28
Github user adamretter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/57
@bodewig Ah okay cool. Thanks
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/57
@adamretter the PR was merged too late for 1.10.2, it is part of the 1.10.3
release candidate we are currently voting on.
---
-
To
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
