Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant iteself, I was
hoping for some reuse here
One would think so, but the truth is that you'll find copy-paste reuse
in this area instead of delegation
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Marc Portierhttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0116284/
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Message-
From: Marc Portier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 1:32 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: having datatypes load classes
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards,
-marc=
--
Marc Portierhttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0116284/
[EMAIL PROTECTED
are to be expected.
could you elaborate,
and maybe be explicit on how this can affect my doing ATM?
I just encountered enough reason to ditch my 1.5.x and go for CVS HEAD
to add this to, so I am interested...
regards,
-marc=
--
Marc Portierhttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought
treatement...
(what about these ./proposal things?)
Finally some practical stuff:
- I take it the prefered patch format is cvs -q diff -u -N ?
- tests are currently not working in cvs head (I see a failure on
the
diving in...
-marc=
--
Marc Portierhttp://outerthought.org
