--- Gus Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Loughran wrote:
I'm very happy with the move. I just don't think we should use this
as
an excuse to go s/Hashtable/HashMap/ s/Vector/ArrayList/ through
all the
I would agree that this type of conversion is of limmited value.
Just a side note: This conversion would IMHO not only be of limited
value, but plain wrong. If anything, it should be s/Hashtable/Map/
s/Vector/List, as far as interfaces are concerned.
Not only does this much more adhere to OOD principles, it also keeps a
refactored interface source-compatible with 1.1 clients, as Hashtable
also implements Map. This way there is no need for an all-at-once,
merciless refactoring...
Having said that, has anyone ever thought about whether the transition
from synchronized 1.1 collections to unsynchronized 1.2 collections
might pose any problems?
Stefan
=
Stefan Moebius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wurzener Str. 43+49 351 8475827
01127 Dresden +49 172 8739617
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com