Re: Java 22 is GA + Heads-up!

Hello David, I ran our Ant testsuite against Java 22 build 22+36-2370 and Java 23 EA build 23-ea+17-1368. The tests completed fine and no regressions or issues were found: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/48/

Release Ant 1.10.15?

Hello everyone, It's been around 6 months since our last Ant 1.10.x release. We have some reasonable amount of changes and bug fixes done since then https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/master/WHATSNEW#L1. If it's OK then I plan to do the next 1.10.x release in a few weeks, unless someone is

Re: [VOTE] Retire the IvyDE Subproject

+1 for retiring IvyDE. -Jaikiran On 23/11/23 12:49 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I'm really sorry and embarrassed but I seem to have misunderstood the purpose of the Attic, it is not responsible for retiring subprojects, only for top level projects like Ant as a whole with all subprojects. The

Re: [VOTE] Send IvyDE to the Apache Attic

On 19/11/23 11:09 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: ... So here is the formal vote: I hereby propose to create a board resolution that will send IvyDE to the Apache Attic. +1 -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: JDK 21 Is Now GA, a New VS Code Extension, and an Annotation Processing Heads-up

Hello David, I ran the Ant testsuite against Java 21 (build 21.0.1+12-29) and the tests all ran fine https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/41/. > Needless to say, that Java 21 is an important release, so may I ask you to send me a brief email

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.10.14 released

in ant.bat that does an initial execution of java.exe to check specification level regarding the setting of java.security.manager? I see the bourne shell script has no equivalent code. --ewh On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, 12:51 AM Jaikiran Pai wrote: The Apache Ant Team is pleased to announce the release

Re: Need help with release versions in bugzilla

Thank you Stefan. I probably didn't look correctly when trying to close a recent bug that got fixed. I see that the bug is now correctly fixed for 1.10.15. Thank you. -Jaikiran On 08/09/23 12:13 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2023-09-08, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Can someone with admin permissions

Need help with release versions in bugzilla

Can someone with admin permissions please mark 1.10.14 as a released version in Ant bugzilla and create a new 1.10.15 release in it? I forgot to ask for help when I released 1.10.14. -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Future of Ivy and IvyDE

I agree with what Stefan notes in his mail. Some years back when I started contributing to Ivy, I realized that the documentation (formal or informal) related to the internal implementation details of Ivy is non-existent. Sometimes I had to select a file, go over its commit history then go

[RESULT] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1

With (binding) +1s for Stefan, Maarten, me and Paul (non-binding), this vote has now passed. I'll now go ahead with the rest of the release process. Thank you all for the help in moving this release forward. -Jaikiran On 16/08/23 6:05 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello everyone, I've created RC1

Re: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.5.2 Based on RC2

+1 Downloaded the RC2 of 2.5.2 and built some projects, checked some manuals and docs and the checksum. -Jaikiran On 17/08/23 10:22 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all I've cancelled the previous vote as the NOTICE file didn't contain 2023. sorry about this. Now I've built a new release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1

+1 - Downloaded the newer version and checked the NOTICE file - verified the checksum - Built some projects using this newer version, on Java 8, 17 and 20 - Checked manual docs for some of the tasks -Jaikiran On 16/08/23 6:05 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello everyone, I've created RC1

Re: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.5.2 Based on RC1

On 17/08/23 10:02 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I have not built the update site because I couldn't get the build process to work, so if anybody with the proper build environment wants to create one, thank you. I'm sure we can create it after the release if we want to. Is this the Eclipse update

Re: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.5.2 Based on RC1

Hello Stefan, +1. The NOTICE file however will need an update to the year (it's currently having 2022). - Downloaded from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/ivy/2.5.2/ - Verified the checksum - Checked the NOTICE file (needs an update to the year) - Checked some random manuals -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1

From: Jaikiran Pai Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 8:35:22 AM To: u...@ant.apache.org ; dev@ant.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1 EXTERNAL EMAIL Hello everyone, I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.14 release: git tag: ANT_1.10.14_RC1

[VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1

Hello everyone, I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.14 release: git tag: ANT_1.10.14_RC1     on commit: 53f19eccf49acf526415997046dca5a5135b0e8f tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/     revision: 63474 Maven artifacts:

Re: Release Ivy 2.5.2

Sounds good to me. -Jaikiran On 13/08/23 4:45 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all while Jaikiran talks about release Ant, I intend to cut a new Ivy release soonish. We've seen two bug fixes to Ivy and I believe IVY-1642 shows a

Release Ant 1.10.14?

We have a decent amount of fixes and changes since we released Ant 1.10.13 https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/master/WHATSNEW. Plus, Ant 1.10.13 broke some setups due to our changes to SecurityManager related usage. I recently reverted those SecurityManager related changes and have now pushed

Re: JDK 22 is in Rampdown Phase 2 | Annotation Processing Change Heads-up

Hello David, I ran the Ant testsuite against JDK 21 EA build 21-ea+34-2500 and the tests ran fine https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/37/. The 22 EA build 22-ea+9-633 tests too ran fine

Re: How to use custom .ivy2 directory

Hello Yuri, There's a section in https://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/2.5.1/tutorial/defaultconf.html called "Setting up the repositories" which explains the use of the ivy.default.ivy.user.dir property which controls this location. -Jaikiran On 07/08/23 1:42 pm, Yuri wrote: One project

Re: JDK 21 EA builds 22 & Sequenced Collections Heads-up

Hello David, I ran the Ant testsuite against Java 21 EA build 21-ea+22-1890 and all tests went fine without any failures https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/35/ -Jaikiran On 15/05/23 8:08 pm, David Delabassee wrote: Welcome to the latest

Re: Release Ant 1.10.13?

Hello Paul, On 12/12/22 5:30 am, Paul King wrote: Do you know if there is an issue with the "allow" class approach if multiple projects adopt that technique? E.g. if Netbeans or Groovy also have an allow class, will that cause a split package violation or since it isn't really referenced except

Re: Issues running tests on Gump after switching to Java 21

Hello Stefan, I had a brief look. Do you happen to know how these builds are launched in Gump? I have never used gump before, so I'm not familiar with it. Most of these failures in Ant build seem to be happening due to: [java] java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: The Security Manager is

Re: JDK 20 Release Candidate and Deprecation

Hello David, I ran the Ant testsuite against Java 20 build 20+36-2344 and Java 21 EA build 21-ea+11-905. No regressions were found: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/33/

Re: Need help with Ant versions in bugzilla

Thank you Stefan. I didn't check before sending this mail :) -Jaikiran On 10/01/23 7:16 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2023-01-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Now that we have released 1.10.13 of Ant, could someone with bugzilla access please create a new 1.10.13 product version and a new 1.10.14

Need help with Ant versions in bugzilla

Now that we have released 1.10.13 of Ant, could someone with bugzilla access please create a new 1.10.13 product version and a new 1.10.14 milestone version, for Ant? -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.10.13 released

The Apache Ant Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.10.13. Apache Ant is a Java library and command-line tool that helps building software. The Apache Ant team currently maintains two lines of development. The 1.9.x releases require Java 5 at runtime and 1.10.x requires

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.13 based on RC1

to rel/1.10.12 Martijn Op 09/01/2023 om 02:30 schreef Jaikiran Pai: +1 Tried the new version to build some existing projects - worked fine Checked NOTICE file and some random manual docs - looks fine -Jaikiran On 06/01/23 4:57 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2023-01-04, Jaikiran Pai wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.13 based on RC1

+1 Tried the new version to build some existing projects - worked fine Checked NOTICE file and some random manual docs - looks fine -Jaikiran On 06/01/23 4:57 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2023-01-04, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Happy new year, everyone :) to you as well I've created RC1 release

[VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.13 based on RC1

Happy new year, everyone :) I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.13 release: git tag: ANT_1.10.13_RC1     on commit: 6996b80b5fb59cc2769f7098d837de32680a tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/     revision: 59117 Maven artifacts:

Re: Release Ant 1.10.13?

Hello Stefan, On 26/11/22 11:33 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2022-11-19, Stefan Bodewig wrote: while running all tests locally I realized https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/194 introduces a bug when tars have an encoding set. You can see this with UntarTest failing. A multibyte encoding like

Re: Release Ant 1.10.13?

Hello Stefan, On 18/11/22 2:40 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2022-11-16, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Users can still use the current released Ant version against these recent Java versions, but they additionally have to set a system property while launching Ant to allow setting the security manager

Re: [ant] branch master updated: add java.security.manager=allow while launching against Java 19

Hello ewh, Thank you for these experiments and reporting the results. This certainly helped me decide which way to go about it. When I had initially tried using "allow" as a Java class (as done in NetBeans), I was unsure if that would be the right way to go. It didn't feel clean and I

Re: JDK 20 EAb22, ZenGC EA builds, JavaFX 20 EAb5 and several heads-ups!

Hello David, We have been a bit slow recently in running the Ant testsuite and responding to the EA releases. I found some time today and triggered a run against the latest JDK 20 EA available at https://jdk.java.net/20/ which is (build 20-ea+27-2213). That has exposed a new failure in the

Re: Release Ant 1.10.13?

Hello Stefan, On 19/11/22 10:41 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2022-11-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On my personal TODO list there are a few minor things like Java 20 removing another target option that we may want to tell users about. Nothing of this is critical AFAIR and shouldn't hold up a

Release Ant 1.10.13?

Hello everyone, We last released Ant more than a year back. During that period we have had some good amount of bug fixes and changes that have gone in. Plus, Java 18 and beyond was released in the meantime where setting the security manager isn't allowed by default (Ant sets it). Users can

Re: Message output level not public for Project class

A new method has been introduced on BuildLogger interface called getMessageOutputLevel() which will return the currently set level. This will be available in the next Ant release. -Jaikiran On 11/10/22 10:38 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote: With Ant 1.10.x version requiring Java 8, I think it should

Re: [VOTE] Release Iyv 2.5.1 Based on RC1

+1 - Downloaded the apache-ivy-2.5.1-bin.tar.gz. - Installed locally. - Ran  java -jar $IVY_HOME/ivy-2.5.1.jar -version (correct version reported) - Then built a few existing projects with this version and they passed - Checked some docs in the "doc" folder and they looked fine. -Jaikiran

Re: Message output level not public for Project class

With Ant 1.10.x version requiring Java 8, I think it should now be possible for us to add a new (default) method to the org.apache.tools.ant.BuildLogger interface to return the current set (or some default) log level. I will add something along these lines shortly. -Jaikiran On 11/10/22

Re: Migrate from Bugzilla to GitHub Issues

I agree with Stefan. GitHub has its own set of pleasant features but I don't think moving Ant's issue tracker to GitHub is necessary. I haven't been around in the Ant community since the beginning but for the past few years that I've been around, I don't think reporting issues in Bugzilla has

Re: JDK 19: Rampdown Phase 1 + EA builds 26 & JDK 20: EA builds 1

Additionally, I ran the Ant testsuite on a macos setup locally with JDK 19 EA build 19-ea+26-2060 by using --enable-preview. No issues were encountered in the testsuite. -Jaikiran On 16/06/22 7:11 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello David, We ran the Ant testsuite against JDK 19 EA build 19-ea+26

Re: JDK 19: Rampdown Phase 1 + EA builds 26 & JDK 20: EA builds 1

Hello David, We ran the Ant testsuite against JDK 19 EA build 19-ea+26-2060 on a Linux system. No issues were found in this run https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/26/. -Jaikiran On 13/06/22 6:47 pm, David Delabassee wrote: Greetings! JDK

Re: synchronized and Loom

Hello Stefan, My personal opinion is that we continue with our release plans (whenever we do it) instead of waiting for completing these changes. The virtual threads feature is a preview feature in JDK 19, so I think as long as our tests pass and Ant is usable in Java 19 with

Re: Please consider releasing Apache Ant 1.10.13?

Hello Simon, I do have it on my task list to do a release in the coming weeks. I don't have an exact date yet. One change that we did recently was to make Ant work out of the box (without setting any additional environment variable values or system properties) to make it work against Java 18

Re: JDK 19 - Virtual Threads Testing!

Hello David, I did a quick run of our Ant project testsuite against the Java 19 EA version (build 19-ea+23-1706). This round of testing did _not_ enable preview features and thus it didn't test virtual threads yet. I just wanted to make sure this EA version works fine without virtual threads

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Ant » Ant-Build-from-POMs #120

Hello Matt, That job keeps failing every other time. I haven't had a chance to understand why it fails nor do I know what that job is for. I think you can ignore that specific job failure since it's not your commits which is causing it. The only failure that looks related to the recent

Re: [ant] branch master updated: add java.security.manager=allow while launching against Java 19

Hello Jan, On 08/02/22 12:04 pm, Jan Lahoda wrote: On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:53 AM Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello Earl, On 08/02/22 12:59 am, Earl Hood wrote: How exactly does setting the sysprop for only 18 and 19 allow folks to test their stuff? If Ant currently depends on the security

Re: [ant] branch master updated: add java.security.manager=allow while launching against Java 19

Hello Stefan, On 08/02/22 1:15 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2022-02-07, Jaikiran Pai wrote: So the launch scripts (the Linux one and the .bat for Windows one) have both been updated to set this system property only for Java 18 and 19. I expect this to be a temporary thing till the new API

Re: Java 8 for Apache Ivy

+1. No objections. A while back I had thought of proposing this. The worry I had/have was that doing some of these refactoring might introduce hard to catch regressions in the core of Ivy itself (which I personally haven't fully had a grasp of yet). Having said that, targetting Ivy against

Re: [ant] branch master updated: add java.security.manager=allow while launching against Java 19

Hello Earl, On 08/02/22 12:59 am, Earl Hood wrote: How exactly does setting the sysprop for only 18 and 19 allow folks to test their stuff? If Ant currently depends on the security manager to operate, why not set the sysprop regardless, then remove in future when a replacement API exists?

Re: [ant] branch master updated: add java.security.manager=allow while launching against Java 19

Hello Stefan, I was planning to send out a mail about this change later tonight. But good you brought this up. To give some background, the security manager changes starting Java 18 make it such that setting of the security manager at runtime now throws an exception, which effectively fails

Re: JDK 18 Rampdown Phase 2 & JDK 19 Early-Access Builds

Hello David, I ran the Java 18 build 18-ea+34-2083 and Java 19 build 19-ea+8-441 against our Ant testsuite on a Linux setup and we observed no regressions, except security manager exceptions. We had to do changes to our Ant launch command to get past the security manager runtime exceptions

Re: [DISCUSS] JUnit 5 Customization

Hello Aleksei, On 22/12/21 7:59 pm, Aleksei Zotov wrote: Hi Ant Developers, I'm working on the migration of Apache Cassandra project from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5 (CASSANDRA-16630 ) which turned out to be larger than I originally expected. At

Re: JDK 18 Early-Access builds 23 are available

Hello David, Given the security manager changes in this JDK 18 EA build, a lot of our Ant tests have failed against this version. This was expected and we had anticipated this when the work on these changes had started in JDK. This will need changes in the Ant project to make it work starting

Re: Thank you! JDK 18 Early Access build 20 is now available

Hello Rory, I ran the JDK 18 EA (build 18-ea+20-1248) against our Ant testsuite on Linux and no issues were encountered: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/82/jdk_axis=jdk18_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/ -Jaikiran On 26/10/21 5:37 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote:

Re: Need help with new versions in bugzilla for Ant

On 19/10/21 9:37 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-10-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Can someone with access to Bugzilla please create a new 1.10.12 product version and a new 1.10.13 milestone version, for Ant? Done. Thank you Stefan. I don't think anybody else of the project team has enough

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.10.12 released

The Apache Ant Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.10.12. Apache Ant is a Java library and command-line tool that helps building software. The Apache Ant team currently maintains two lines of development. The 1.9.x releases require Java 5 at runtime and 1.10.x

Need help with new versions in bugzilla for Ant

Can someone with access to Bugzilla please create a new 1.10.12 product version and a new 1.10.13 milestone version, for Ant? I'm almost done with the rest of the release formalities and will send the release annonucement later today. -Jaikiran

Re: [RESULT] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC2

Op zondag 17 oktober 2021 09:02:30 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai : +1. - Used this version to build some of our internal projects. - Checked some random manuals. All looks fine. -Jaikiran On 13/10/21 11:05 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I've created a new RC2 release candidate for 1.10.12

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC2

+1. - Used this version to build some of our internal projects. - Checked some random manuals. All looks fine. -Jaikiran On 13/10/21 11:05 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I've created a new RC2 release candidate for 1.10.12: git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC2 on commit

[VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC2

I've created a new RC2 release candidate for 1.10.12: git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC2 on commit: 4b420359942dfb1221f308d08f3648712fea9f83 tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/   revision: 50387 Maven artifacts:

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello Paul, On 05/10/21 2:27 pm, Paul King wrote: I was surprised to see binary jars in the src archives under lib/optional. I don't know the history, so perhaps it is fine. Thank you for testing this release. I had a look at our previous releases and they too contain

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

On 07/10/21 11:27 am, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: If the goal of 1.10.12 is to be compilable on Java 17, This 1.10.12 release of Ant (like our previous releases) is a bug fix release. Ant 1.10.x require a Java 8+ runtime. This release changes nothing on that front. One of the bug fixes in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

Hello Paul, On 05/10/21 2:27 pm, Paul King wrote: I was surprised to see binary jars in the src archives under lib/optional. I don't know the history, so perhaps it is fine. Thank you for testing this release. I had a look at our previous releases and they too contain the binary jars in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

I'll need one more PMC member's vote on this for me to move forward. Anyone have some time this week to test this? -Jaikiran On 03/10/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-09-30, Jaikiran Pai wrote: This release is mainly a bug fix release and the exact changes are noted in https

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

+1 - Downloaded the .tar.gz binary - Checked the NOTICE file and some random manuals - Built internal projects using Java 8 and this version of Ant - Built some sample projects with Java 17 and this version Ant All looks fine. -Jaikiran On 30/09/21 8:28 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I've

[VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

I've created a release candidate for 1.10.12: git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC1 on commit: cb7f242aa099c069bd75e6ee4d6e50b56fd73b71 tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/   revision: 50166 Maven artifacts:

Re: Release 1.10.12 of Ant?

On 28/09/21 12:55 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-09-26, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I was planning to initiate a release tonight, but trying to upgrade one of the optional dependencies has shown up some interesting issue in the maven ant task (which apparently has been EOLed[1]) that we use

Re: Release 1.10.12 of Ant?

On 19/09/21 3:30 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-09-16, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-09-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I wanted to look into and sort out https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65424 in this release too, but it looks like I may not be able to do that and I'm not sure how

Release 1.10.12 of Ant?

Java 17 has been released yesterday. We have a relatively minor fix in javadoc task which affects Java 17 in cases where failonwarn=true. Should we consider releasing 1.10.12 of Ant in upcoming days to provide this fix and other fixes that we have done since 1.10.11 release? I wanted to look

Re: Release Announcement: General Availability of Java 17 / JDK 17

Hello Rory, Congratulations on the Java 17 release. I've run Java 17 build 17+35-2724 and Java 18 build 18-ea+14-756 against our Ant testsuite on Linux and all tests have passed without issues:

Re: Upcoming Java 17 release will have an impact on our javadoc task

Hello Stefan, On 27/06/21 4:10 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-06-17, Jaikiran Pai wrote: So right now I don't have specific proposals for fixing this but just a note that we will have to look into this one for the upcoming JDK 17 release. I guess we can simply concatenate stderr

Re: Impact of Java SecurityManager being deprecated for removal post Java 17

On 23/08/21 9:17 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-08-23, Jaikiran Pai wrote: On 19/08/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-08-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello Stefan, On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: At a cursory glance I only see JUnitTask and ExecuteJava deal

Re: Impact of Java SecurityManager being deprecated for removal post Java 17

On 19/08/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-08-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello Stefan, On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: At a cursory glance I only see JUnitTask and ExecuteJava deal with the SecurityManager if permissions have been defined. Where else do we use one? From

Re: Impact of Java SecurityManager being deprecated for removal post Java 17

On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-08-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Ant project will be impacted by this. Ant provides a "permissions" type[1] whose whole goal is to integrate with the Java SecurityManager to allow users to configure the necessary security p

Re: Impact of Java SecurityManager being deprecated for removal post Java 17

Hello Stefan, On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-08-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Ant project will be impacted by this. Ant provides a "permissions" type[1] whose whole goal is to integrate with the Java SecurityManager to allow users to configure the necessary security p

Re: JDK 17 is now in the Release Candidate Phase

Hello Rory, I ran our Ant testsuite on a Linux setup against both Java 17 and Java 18 EA releases. No new issues noticed and things look fine. -Jaikiran On 07/08/21 8:23 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote: Hi Stefan/Jaikiran, *Per the JDK 17 schedule , we are now in the Release Candidate Phase

Impact of Java SecurityManager being deprecated for removal post Java 17

Hello everyone, Some of you might have been following the recent discussions in JDK where the SecurityManager and related APIs will be deprecated (for removal) starting the upcoming Java 17 release. To be clear, this change in Java will have no impact in terms of API usage in Java 17 (except

Re: JDK 17 is now in Rampdown Phase Two

Hello Rory, We ran this against our Ant project and no new issues have been observed with both these JDK 17 and 18 EA builds. -Jaikiran On 16/07/21 12:51 am, Rory O'Donnell wrote: Hi Stefan/Jaikiran, *Per the JDK 17 schedule , we are in Rampdown Phase Two [1].* *Please advise if you find

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.9.15 based on RC1

+1. Downloaded .tar.gz binary. Checked some manuals and the NOTICE file. Used this version to build some of our internal projects. All went fine. -Jaikiran On 10/07/21 11:43 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16: git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1 on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.11 based on RC1

+1. Downloaded the .tar.gz binary, checked the NOTICE file, some manuals and built our internal projects using this new version. All went fine. -Jaikiran On 11/07/21 12:21 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all I've created a release candidate for 1.10.11: git tag: ANT_1.10.11_RC1 on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AntUnit 1.4.1 based on RC1

+1. Did some basic verification: - Downloaded apache-ant-antunit-1.4.1-bin.tar.gz from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/antlibs/antunit/binaries/ - Extracted locally. Checked the NOTICE file. - Checked the WHATSNEW file. - Checked the docs/index.html - Checked that

Re: new warnings produced by task under Open JDK 17-ea+28-2534

wrote: Thanks for that explanation, Jaikiran. On 6/27/21 8:29 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello Rick, Thank you for this report. We have been watching this area and have been aware of this issue, including one other user report[1]. I'm just waiting for things to become a bit more clear on this front

Re: new warnings produced by task under Open JDK 17-ea+28-2534

Hello Rick, Thank you for this report. We have been watching this area and have been aware of this issue, including one other user report[1]. I'm just waiting for things to become a bit more clear on this front before coming up with any proposal in the Ant project on how to deal with this.

Re: JDK 17 Early Access build 28 & JDK 18 build 3 are available

Hello Rory, I ran JDK 17 EA (build 17-ea+28-2534) against our Ant testsuite on a linux setup and apart from the one failure[1] that is a result on the intentional change in javadoc tool[2], rest all tests passed fine. We (the Ant project) will sort out the javadoc issue in the coming weeks.

SecurityManager in Java is being deprecated - Please try your Ant builds against JDK 17 EA builds

Those of you who haven't yet heard, the upcoming JDK 17 release will be deprecating (for future removal) the SecurityManager classes and some of the related infrastructure. The complete details of this proposed change are explained here https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411. The initial changes

Upcoming Java 17 release will have an impact on our javadoc task

The recently released EA version of JDK 17 has introduced a change in the javadoc tool. Previously (JDK 8 all the way through JDK 16) used to log certain messages from the javadoc tool to STDOUT. Our javadoc task's implementation expects such messages of STDOUT. Starting this JDK EA release

Re: [External] : Re: JDK 17 is now in Rampdown Phase One

Additionally, more as a FYI - we have started to receive user reports that the new security manager deprecation WARNING messages on System.err are impacting some of their existing build scripts https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65381 -Jaikiran On 15/06/21 9:51 pm, Jaikiran Pai

Re: [External] : Re: JDK 17 is now in Rampdown Phase One

Hello Rory, On 14/06/21 11:42 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote: Many thanks Jaikiran for the analysis and the feedback to the security-dev mailing list ! Do let us know about the final test failure ? I had a look at this one in more detail. The failure is in one of our javadoc related tests[1].

Re: JDK 17 is now in Rampdown Phase One

Hello Rory, This JDK 17 EA build 26, has caused at least one regression in our testsuite. It relates to the new WARNING message that gets printed out to System.err, when something at runtime sets the security manager. Given the nature of the test that's failing, fixing it is trivial for us,

Re: Creating a New AntUnit Release?

Hello Stefan, Releasing a new version sounds good. As for the version number, I'll let you decide since I don't have prior background with AntUnit releases :) -Jaikiran On 23/05/21 2:37 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all it looks as if we didn't do what we preach, see

Re: JDK 17 Early Access build 23 is available

Hello Rory, I ran this against our Ant project on a Linux system. No issues observed in this run with JDK 17 build 17-ea+23-2064. https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk17_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/73/ -Jaikiran On 21/05/21 12:28 pm, Rory O'Donnell

Re: JDK 17 Early Access build 21 is available

Hello Rory, Ran our Ant testsuite against JDK 16.0.1 (build 16.0.1+9-24)[1] and JDK 17-ea (build 17-ea+21-1866)[2]. No issues observed. [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk16_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/72/ [2]

Re: [PROPOSAL] ant-junitlauncher watchdog customization

Hello Aleksei, That looks fine to me. I've merged it to our master branch. I've added your github profile name (Alex) to our contributors list. If you want to use a different name to be added, please let us know, I'll update accordingly. -Jaikiran On 30/04/21 2:06 pm, Aleksei Zotov wrote:

Re: JDK 17 EA build 18 is available

Hello Rory, No issues were observed against our Ant testsuite on a Linux setup with JDK 17 build 17-ea+18-1490. https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/71/jdk_axis=jdk17_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/ -Jaikiran On 20/04/21 3:21 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote: *Hi

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.10.10 released

The Apache Ant Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.10.10. Apache Ant is a Java library and command-line tool that helps building software. The Apache Ant team currently maintains two lines of development. The 1.9.x releases require Java 5 at runtime and 1.10.x requires

Re: Close 1.10.10 in bugzilla?

Thank you Stefan. -Jaikiran On 18/04/21 1:36 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-04-17, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I just completed the release formalities for Ant 1.10.10. I will send out the official announcement mail on Monday. In the meantime, could someone which access permissions on Bugzilla

Close 1.10.10 in bugzilla?

I just completed the release formalities for Ant 1.10.10. I will send out the official announcement mail on Monday. In the meantime, could someone which access permissions on Bugzilla please close the 1.10.10 version and create a new 1.10.11 version there? -Jaikiran

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.10 based on RC1

With +1s from Stefan, Maarten, me and Paul (non-binding), this vote has passed. I'll start the rest of the release activities shortly. Thank you everyone. -Jaikiran On 12/04/21 10:01 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I've created a release candidate for 1.10.10: git tag: ANT_1.10.10_RC1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.10 based on RC1

100 tests exercising various aspects of Ant functionality for Groovy's AntBuilder and Groovy's various Ant tasks. There were no failures. Cheers, Paul. On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 2:31 PM Jaikiran Pai wrote: I've created a release candidate for 1.10.10: git tag: ANT_1.10.10_RC1 on com

  1   2   3   4   5   >