[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #69: 2.4.x

2018-04-12 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/69 Check out the [nightlies](https://ant.apache.org/nightlies.html) I was commenting here because @supertick is apparently pushing changes to 2.4.x release branch, but the RC is from the master.

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #69: 2.4.x

2018-04-12 Thread sutchark
Github user sutchark commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/69 How should we let you know? Here? I am interested in using 2.5.0. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #69: 2.4.x

2018-04-12 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/69 @supertick FYI, Ivy 2.5.0 RC is on the way, @nlalevee has kindly taken the role of release manager. Your latest commits are not merged to master, though. If you are interested in using 2.5.0, please

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #69: 2.4.x

2018-03-22 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/69 Issue tracker for the project is [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira). Apache has own Git infrastructure, GitHub is use to increase exposure and as easy means to suggest code changes (rather than

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #69: 2.4.x

2018-03-22 Thread wordlessly
Github user wordlessly commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/69 I also spam this pull request. (why not open issue tracker here?) Ivy CLI says: -typescomma separated list of accepted artifact types java -jar ivy-2.4.0.jar

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #69: 2.4.x

2018-03-19 Thread supertick
Github user supertick commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/69 I think it would be great "not" to have an additional CLI option, but then you cannot have a System.exit(1) terminating the client code

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #69: 2.4.x

2018-03-19 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/69 I suggest closing this PR. The main problem here is that programmatic use should not be adressed by adding CLI options which make no sense. Also, if resolve() ends with errors, it's best to throw an

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #69: 2.4.x

2018-03-19 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/69 Could you please provide a unit test to demonstrate what is wrong with [IVY-1576 fix](https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/commit/3b17df0ab67a1f14794bc6c60b735f3354caec9e)? ---