Github user twogee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
I reviewed third party libraries that could be updated; the documentation
could be more emphatic about jspc being deprecated.
---
-
Github user twogee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
SLF4J was written by the [author of
Log4j](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log4j) who wrote [an
article](https://articles.qos.ch/classloader.html) cataloguing the problems
with Commons Logging. When
Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Actually I do not agree with the slf4j change ;-)
What problem are you trying to solve? To me both existing logging backends
are legacy and we maintain them for people who want to use them -
Github user asfgit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/11/
---
Github user asfgit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/5/
---
Github user asfgit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/10/
---
Github user asfgit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/4/
---
Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
I don't really think you need a PR - I've upgraded BCEL last week and did
so directly. Ant tends to use a "commit then review" model where people look at
the commits and things get amended later.
---
Github user twogee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
I updated WHATSNEW and added a replacement for all legacy logging
frameworks. There are more potential updates: Java Mail API, Rhino, Jasper;
perhaps they deserve a separate PR?
---
Github user asfgit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/9/
---
Github user asfgit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/3/
---
Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
looks good to me - you may want to add a note to WHATSNEW as well
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For
Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
I'll have a look later and try not to be a PITA again.
WRT antunit. https://github.com/apache/ant-antlibs-antunit and you are a
committer ;-)
---
Github user twogee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
I hope the third time is the charm ð
A couple of wishes for antunit: it should have ant/ant-launcher as
"provided" dependencies and it should have a "tempdir" attribute similar to
junit task.
Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
:+1:
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Github user twogee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
This is exactly why I was looking into it -- those things tend to
deteriorate over time ð
To sum it up, I'll revert stripping, restore CPL and correct the README
(that tests rely on JUnit 3
Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Thank you.
The junit 4 situation is a bit weird, even more than I recalled it to be. I
didn't remember us stripping classes from the jar and don't think this is true
for the 4.11 jar in our
Github user twogee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
BTW, JUnit license has changed from CPL to EPL.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user twogee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Sorry about confusion ð -- here comes a corrected commit.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For
Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Ant's junit task itself is supposed to work with JUnit 3 not only 4, so it
is not superfluous at all IMHO,
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user twogee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Sorry about the whitespace -- I can separate all "drive-by" changes into a
commit on its own.
Could you please elaborate on having both JUnit 3 and 4? JUnit 4 is Java 5
compatible, and most test
Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
Thank you @twogee
The idea was you can build a minimal set of Ant (without the optional tasks
that have external dependencies) and run the tests for this minimal set without
downloading
22 matches
Mail list logo
