Why not simply ?That is the date the
vote started and the binaries were built?Or perhaps you could add a few days to
it and make sure the vote ends at that date?
It's just strange when reading the documentation of a released version to see
that it's 'unreleased' or 'during-release'...
Maarten
Van: "Matèrne, Jan (RZF, Ref 410)" <jan.mate...@fv.nrw.de>
Aan: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org>
Verzonden: woensdag 31 mei 10:25 2017
Onderwerp: AW: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC1
Maybe
?
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2017 09:46
An: dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC1
On 2017-05-31, Maarten Coene wrote:
> The changes.xml still contains the following line: date="unreleased">
> I'm not sure this should block the release, but I think it would be better to
> fill in the correct date.
This is a chicken and egg problem. As long as the vote hasn't passed, I
don't know the release date :-)
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
