Re: Test failures (Gump is coming to tell us anyway ...)

2003-04-22 Thread peter reilly
Hi, Your guess is nearly right, I originally used beanshell, after modifying it to use apache BSF. When submitting I modified the tests to use javascript, but missed the test to check if script is available. Cheers, Peter On Tuesday 15 April 2003 07:39, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > In addition, test

AW: Test failures (Gump is coming to tell us anyway ...)

2003-04-15 Thread Jan . Materne
Ok, waiting for ending "solution 4" and decide later about the first three :-) Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Dienstag, 15. April 2003 11:21 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: Test failures (

Re: Test failures (Gump is coming to tell us anyway ...)

2003-04-15 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But I think this is a common problem. Yes and no. Part of it is a manifestation of bug 18476, but that wouldn't explain why a non-linefeed, non-cariage-return character gets removed on Unix. > 1. provide an input file --> platform de

AW: Test failures (Gump is coming to tell us anyway ...)

2003-04-15 Thread Jan . Materne
alsIgnoreLineEndings()). comment? Jan Matèrne > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Dienstag, 15. April 2003 08:39 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Test failures (Gump is coming to tell us anyway ...) > > Like for Jesse, te

Test failures (Gump is coming to tell us anyway ...)

2003-04-15 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Like for Jesse, testTailSkip and testTailLinesSkip fail on Linux for me, I bet it is a line ending problem. As the nightly Gump build is performed on Linux as well, we are going to get nagged. In addition, testScriptFilter fails. It seems as if the new filter was using the old IBM BSF package na