Hi Thomas,
The part of initiating the shutdown from another operator was the original
intention of the email.
~ Bhupesh
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Thomas Weise wrote:
> Bhupesh,
>
> If your intention is to let processing complete, the sources should
> terminate the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15829220#comment-15829220
]
Thomas Weise commented on APEXMALHAR-2392:
--
{code}
$ git grep -C1 mysql-connector-java
Thomas Weise created APEXMALHAR-2392:
Summary: Upgrade mysql connector in demo applications
Key: APEXMALHAR-2392
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2392
Project: Apache Apex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Teddy Rusli updated APEXMALHAR-2390:
Attachment: FireShot Capture 93 - Apache Apex Malhar Documentation -
Teddy Rusli created APEXMALHAR-2391:
---
Summary: JDBC Poller Input Operator exist but not listed
Key: APEXMALHAR-2391
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2391
Project: Apache Apex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Teddy Rusli updated APEXMALHAR-2390:
Summary: Operator list in doc is not sorted (was: There is no sorting
operator list)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Teddy Rusli updated APEXMALHAR-2390:
Description: The list of operators at http://apex.apache.org/docs/malhar/
is not
Teddy Rusli created APEXMALHAR-2390:
---
Summary: There is no sorting operator list
Key: APEXMALHAR-2390
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2390
Project: Apache Apex Malhar
GitHub user trusli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/538
Sort operator list in alphabetical order, correct a few typos and add
missing JDBC Poll Input
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Yan resolved APEXMALHAR-2359.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.7.0
> Optimise fire trigger to avoid go
Could we enable this for the download button as well.
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> Probably should be accessible to PMC and/or committers only for now. If
> the PMC wants to allow sharing this data with other 3rd parties, then the
> privacy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15828535#comment-15828535
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2359:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/518
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Bhupesh,
If your intention is to let processing complete, the sources should
terminate the stream (that's already implemented, except that you want to
initiate it from another operator). It does not really matter if they all
stop at the same streaming window.
If you want to just stop the
Hello, fellow Apache enthusiast. Thanks for your participation, and
interest in, the projects of the Apache Software Foundation.
I wanted to remind you that the Call For Papers (CFP) for ApacheCon
North America, and Apache: Big Data North America, closes in less than a
month. If you've been
Agreed on input adapter way.
Enforcing all input adapters send shutdown on the same window cannot be
guaranteed, so there will be a corner case where windows are not aligned.
An ask from Stram to send shutdown way in the future reduces the scope of
the corner case, but then defeats the purpose.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15827946#comment-15827946
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-604:
-
GitHub user tushargosavi opened a pull request:
GitHub user tushargosavi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/447
APEXCORE-604 extend DAG API to get operators and streams from the DAG.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15827814#comment-15827814
]
Tushar Gosavi commented on APEXCORE-503:
I am already doing the change to shutdown the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15827815#comment-15827815
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-294:
-
GitHub user tushargosavi reopened a pull request:
GitHub user tushargosavi reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/424
APEXCORE-294 controlled shutdown of an application.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/tushargosavi/apex-core
Dear Community,
I have changed the implementaion plan based on PR comments. Following
is the new proposal for this feature.
https://docs.google.com/a/datatorrent.com/document/d/1hSLH4xi_15OWwW4KY7--LU3e2iHHhfthOpATicnC5eE/edit?usp=sharing
Please provide the feedback. I will update the PR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hitesh Kapoor closed APEXMALHAR-2382.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
As per the consensus on the dev email thread (attached to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hitesh Kapoor updated APEXMALHAR-2382:
--
Attachment: De_meta_mail_thread.pdf
Mail thread discussing if/how this Jira should
+1 to have this feature.
-Priyanka
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Pramod Immaneni
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Currently a DAG that is generated by user, if contains any POJOfied
Yes, Amol. That will be the case for a kill type of shutdown.
But for graceful shutdown, it is important that each operator in the DAG
processes exactly the same amount of data. That is the reason the shutdown
needs to start at input operators and stop their functioning as the first
step.
26 matches
Mail list logo