[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15852481#comment-15852481
]
devendra tagare commented on APEXCORE-636:
--
Hi,
In the current kerberos implementation, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15852338#comment-15852338
]
Matt Zhang commented on APEXMALHAR-2398:
Upgrade commons-beanutils dependency to 1.9.2 (same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15852333#comment-15852333
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2398:
GitHub user mattqzhang opened a pull
GitHub user mattqzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/547
APEXMALHAR-2398 commons-beanutils upgrade
@PramodSSImmaneni Please review
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
The first one looks cleaner for readability.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Michelle Xiao
wrote:
> I uploaded them to Google drive. Here are the links for these two
> screenshots:
>
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Ur3m9yvOe3NjhTdFJYdnpENU0/
> view?usp=sharing
>
Will do that.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Vlad Rozov wrote:
> IMO, it will be good to summarize schema use case and proposed approach to
> support it on the control tuple e-mail thread. Not everyone interested in
> the custom control tuple may be following schema
Matt Zhang created APEXMALHAR-2398:
--
Summary: commons-beanutils upgrade
Key: APEXMALHAR-2398
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2398
Project: Apache Apex Malhar
Issue
IMO, it will be good to summarize schema use case and proposed approach
to support it on the control tuple e-mail thread. Not everyone
interested in the custom control tuple may be following schema support
thread.
Thank you,
Vlad
On 2/3/17 08:47, Pramod Immaneni wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017
We are not seeing the screenshots Michelle.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Michelle Xiao
wrote:
> If these screenshots are still not visible in this email thread, I will
> send them out in another email.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Michelle
>
>
If these screenshots are still not visible in this email thread, I will
send them out in another email.
Thanks,
Michelle
Attached them again. This time I removed all previous messages.
Maybe they are too big and being stripped out by the mail programs ?
'cause I'm still not seeing them.
Ram
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Michelle Xiao
wrote:
> Here are the screenshots.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Michelle
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Pramod
Here are the screenshots.
Thanks,
Michelle
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Pramod Immaneni
wrote:
> Michelle,
>
> Could you attach the screenshots.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Thomas Weise wrote:
>
> > I don't see a screen shot
Michelle,
Could you attach the screenshots.
Thanks
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Thomas Weise wrote:
> I don't see a screen shot attached to the email.
>
> Thomas
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Michelle Xiao
> wrote:
>
> > I worked locally
Thomas,
Relevant event means any event that involves Apex is some form.
Eg:
1. Contributor builds an app using Apex and want to share it with the
community.
2. Contributor builds tool around Apex and wants to share it with the
community.
3. User integrates apex with their existing tools and
Can you subscribe to secur...@apex.apache.org group.
Thanks
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Matt Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to take it up.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Pramod Immaneni
> wrote:
>
> > We have some
Hi,
I'd like to take it up.
Thanks,
Matt
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Pramod Immaneni
wrote:
> We have some pending security issues that were reported by a user and need
> to be addressed. I wanted to ask if any of devs want to take this up? It
> shouldn't require
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pramod Immaneni reassigned APEXCORE-636:
Assignee: devendra tagare
> Ability to refresh tokens using user's own kerberos
Sounds good. I will create a JIRA and assign to you.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Devendra Tagare
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to take this up.
>
> Thanks,
> Dev
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Pramod Immaneni
> wrote:
>
> > When
Pramod Immaneni created APEXCORE-636:
Summary: Ability to refresh tokens using user's own kerberos
credentials in a managed environment where the application is launched using an
admin with impersonation
Key: APEXCORE-636
We have some pending security issues that were reported by a user and need
to be addressed. I wanted to ask if any of devs want to take this up? It
shouldn't require a high degree of familiarity with the code base or with
security to perform an initial analysis of these issues to determine which
Hi,
I would like to take this up.
Thanks,
Dev
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Pramod Immaneni
wrote:
> When applications run in secure mode, they use delegation tokens to access
> Hadoop resources. These delegation tokens have a lifetime, typically 7
> days, after
When applications run in secure mode, they use delegation tokens to access
Hadoop resources. These delegation tokens have a lifetime, typically 7
days, after which they no longer work and the application will not be able
to communicate with Hadoop. Apex can automatically refresh these tokens
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
bright chen updated APEXCORE-635:
-
Description:
Manage memory to avoid memory copy and garbage collection
The aim of this
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Thomas Weise wrote:
> Agreed. As noted the main concern was the ability to support idempotency.
> It isn't really "re-ordering" because when you have multiple input ports,
> there isn't any ordering guarantee within a streaming window.
>
The
Agreed. As noted the main concern was the ability to support idempotency.
It isn't really "re-ordering" because when you have multiple input ports,
there isn't any ordering guarantee within a streaming window.
The end window boundary is good when the control tuple needs to be
processed after all
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/424
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
I would suggest to be more specific on "relevant events", as that has been
a problem in the past. Here are a few examples and how I would see it:
+1 Events that present Apache Apex and are content wise clearly Apex
+1 Events that have been PMC approved or are organized with PMC involvement
(note
I don't see a screen shot attached to the email.
Thomas
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Michelle Xiao
wrote:
> I worked locally to add events section on Apex home page. Attached are a
> couple of screenshots show how Apex home page look like with this events
>
29 matches
Mail list logo