[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15889620#comment-15889620
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2417:
GitHub user Hitesh-Scorpio opened a pull
GitHub user Hitesh-Scorpio opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/568
APEXMALHAR-2417 Adding Pojo Outer join accumulation
@chinmaykolhatkar @tushargosavi please review
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/566
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15888769#comment-15888769
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-656:
-
GitHub user vrozov opened a pull request:
GitHub user vrozov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/481
APEXCORE-656 Upgrade org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient.
@PramodSSImmaneni please review and merge
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vlad Rozov updated APEXCORE-656:
Summary: Upgrade org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient (was: Upgrade
org.apache.httpcomponents)
Vlad Rozov created APEXCORE-656:
---
Summary: Upgrade org.apache.httpcomponents
Key: APEXCORE-656
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-656
Project: Apache Apex Core
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15888597#comment-15888597
]
bright chen commented on APEXCORE-635:
--
Yes, I agree it should be revisited after migrated to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vlad Rozov reopened APEXCORE-634:
-
> Apex Platform unable to set unifier attributes for modules in DAG
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15888527#comment-15888527
]
Vlad Rozov commented on APEXCORE-635:
-
bq. Yes, Agree, One array of byte only treat as one object.
Hi David,
I went through the discussion, but it seems like it is more on the event
time watermark handling as opposed to batches. What we are trying to do is
have watermarks serve the purpose of demarcating batches using control
tuples. Since each batch is separate from others, we would like to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vlad Rozov updated APEXCORE-655:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Support LATEST as archetype version when creating a project
>
Hi David,
If using time window does not seem appropriate, we can have another class
which is more suited for such sequential and distinct windows. Perhaps, a
CustomWindow option can be introduced which takes in a window id. The
purpose of this window option could be to translate the window id
13 matches
Mail list logo
