Dear Community,
While going through the code, I found that the AutoMetrics are retrieved
from operators using java reflection. This adds a lot of processing
overhead.
Hence to improve the performance of containers and stram, I want to suggest
following appraoch:
1. In Node, try to collect the met
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15925530#comment-15925530
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-660:
-
GitHub user bhupeshchawda opened a pu
GitHub user bhupeshchawda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/484
[REVIEW ONLY] APEXCORE-660 Added documentation for custom control tuple
support
@tweise Please see.
Currently just opened PR for review. Waiting for any other comments over
the re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise reassigned APEXCORE-580:
-
Assignee: Bhupesh Chawda (was: Bhupesh Chawda)
> Interface for processing and emitting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise reassigned APEXCORE-579:
-
Assignee: Bhupesh Chawda (was: Bhupesh Chawda)
> Custom control tuple support
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise reassigned APEXCORE-581:
-
Assignee: Bhupesh Chawda (was: Bhupesh Chawda)
> Delivery of Custom Control Tuples
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gavin updated APEXMALHAR-2206:
--
Reporter: Bhupesh Chawda (was: Bhupesh Chawda)
> Some Application tests taking too long
>
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-site/pull/69
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
GitHub user chinmaykolhatkar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-site/pull/69
Updating rpm & deb packages for apex from bigtop
@tweise Please review and merge.
These are changes related to bigtop upgrade of apex to 3.5.0:
1. Bigtop upgrade of apex has happe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise updated APEXMALHAR-2444:
-
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
> Documentation for Highlevel API
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise moved APEXCORE-666 to APEXMALHAR-2444:
---
Component/s: (was: Documentation)
do
Tushar Gosavi created APEXCORE-667:
--
Summary: Documentation for Modules.
Key: APEXCORE-667
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-667
Project: Apache Apex Core
Issue Type: Docum
Tushar Gosavi created APEXCORE-666:
--
Summary: Documentation for Highlevel API
Key: APEXCORE-666
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-666
Project: Apache Apex Core
Issue Type:
Hi Ajay,
My feeling is you assume handle all tuples in memory.
How to handle the case if memory is not enough to hold all tuples?
thanks
-Bright
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:00 PM, AJAY GUPTA wrote:
> Hi Apex Dev community,
>
> Kindly let me know if implementing this accumulation using TreeMultiS
+1 to the suggestion about linking to what we mean by scalable and fault
tolerant. Many projects falsely claim these capabilities, but of course
your "your mileage may vary." ;)
-Nathan
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 2:13 PM David Yan wrote:
> Here's my proposal. I added one more sentence in the de
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15924402#comment-15924402
]
Pramod Immaneni commented on APEXCORE-577:
--
As a follow up please add versionin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15924400#comment-15924400
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-577:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull re
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/456
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
The JDBC operator was an example of a valid use case where no state needs
to be saved in a checkpoint (it is saved to the database instead). We
cannot break such use cases and neither should the application developer be
exposed to it, especially not in backward incompatible fashion.
I think that t
Hi All,
The PR: https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/422 to solve this issue
looks good to me.
If there are no other comments, will merge this PR soon.
~ Bhupesh
___
Bhupesh Chawda
E: bhup...@datatorrent.com | Twitter: @bhupeshsc
www.da
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15924130#comment-15924130
]
Bhupesh Chawda commented on APEXCORE-575:
-
[~tushargosavi] Can you please update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tushar Gosavi resolved APEXCORE-617.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.6.0
> InputNodeTest intermittently fails with Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15924089#comment-15924089
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-617:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull re
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/451
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Hi Vlad,
I am more worried about backward compatibility. Most of the new users will
be not able to launch simple applications which are starting point while
learning Apex such as PiDemo and WordCount. We could provide a way for user
to not use empty file storage agent for leaf stateless operators
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bhupesh Chawda updated APEXMALHAR-2408:
---
Summary: Issues in correctness of get() for key search in
ManagedTimeStateImpl (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15924001#comment-15924001
]
Bhupesh Chawda commented on APEXMALHAR-2408:
Fixes included in PR: https:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15923999#comment-15923999
]
Bhupesh Chawda commented on APEXMALHAR-2407:
Fixes included in PR: https:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bhupesh Chawda updated APEXMALHAR-2406:
---
Description: Few bugs encountered while using ManagedState. Specific issues
descr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15923943#comment-15923943
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2400:
GitHub user Hitesh-Scorpio o
GitHub user Hitesh-Scorpio opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/581
APEXMALHAR-2400 removing dependency of output fieldnames to input fieâ¦
â¦ld names @chinmaykolhatkar please review.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15923840#comment-15923840
]
Vikram Patil commented on APEXCORE-593:
---
Following steps are executed when get-app
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15923801#comment-15923801
]
Bhupesh Chawda commented on APEXCORE-593:
-
[~vikram] Can you please add more det
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15923717#comment-15923717
]
Chaitanya commented on APEXMALHAR-2406:
---
By mistake, I added it under comment.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chaitanya updated APEXMALHAR-2408:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: Below are the issues:
1) When the key searches all time buckets,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chaitanya updated APEXMALHAR-2408:
--
Description:
Below are the issues:
1) When the key searches all time buckets, not checking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chaitanya updated APEXMALHAR-2407:
--
Description:
Below are the observations:
1) purgeListner is not triggering purgeTimeBuckets
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chaitanya updated APEXMALHAR-2407:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: Below are the observations:
1) purgeListner is not triggering p
38 matches
Mail list logo
