lopment process needs it to be the case.
>> Hence +1 for 3.5.0
>>
>> Plus 3.5.x seems to provide additional goodies like colour outputs as well
>> as a module progress indicators.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ananth
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Yo
1. +1 for 3.3.9.
2. Why do we need 3.5.x if 3.3.9 serves the purpose?
~ Yogi
On 16 May 2018 at 20:20, Ananth G wrote:
> +1 for maven version upgrade.
>
> +1 for version 3.5.x as there seems to be some fixes for issues related to
> this property in version 3.3.9
>
One thing which is not clear to me is: if someone has any contributions
planned for 3.x; will that contribution need 2 different PRs?
If yes, then can we avoid this by giving sufficient time for the community
to prepare for this change?
-1 for immediate release.
-1 for immediate separation for
I would suggest following:
1. Announce some end date for 3.x new features. (To give sufficient time
for community members to plan their feature contributions.)
2. 3.x to 4.x migration should happen on this date.
3. Community members can submit 3.x PRs till this date.
4. New PRs after this date
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra updated APEXMALHAR-2494:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.8.0
> Update demo apps with descript
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra resolved APEXMALHAR-2494.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Update demo apps with descript
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra reassigned APEXMALHAR-2476:
-
Assignee: Yogi Devendra
> Unable to override tupleSeparator prope
Yogi Devendra created APEXMALHAR-2476:
-
Summary: Unable to override tupleSeparator property of
GenericFileOutputOperator using configurations
Key: APEXMALHAR-2476
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837265#comment-15837265
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXMALHAR-2369:
---
[~chaithu] Could you please review this?
>
uldn't worry about table creations as its one-time activity.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > A
> >
> >
> > _____
> > Sent with difficulty, I mean handheld ;)
> >
> > On 13 Jan 2017 6:37 pm, &q
operator guide as well as put a log message when we create table.
> And in case you don't have privileges, the operator should throw meaningful
> message.
>
> -Priyanka
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Yogi Devendra <yogideven...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > My
My suggestions:
1. Have a separate utility script for creating this table.
2. Have README for the utility script
3. Mention about the utility script in the operator javadocs.
4. Mention about the utility script in the application README.
5. If at all, you wish to ease out the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15766547#comment-15766547
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXCORE-593:
I would take this up. [~tushargosavi] has agreed
Yogi Devendra created APEXCORE-593:
--
Summary: apex cli get-app-package-info could not retrieve
propeties defined in properties.xml
Key: APEXCORE-593
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-593
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra updated APEXCORE-593:
---
Summary: apex cli get-app-package-info could not retrieve properties
defined
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra updated APEXMALHAR-2369:
--
Description:
Currently, S3 output is available using S3OutputModule which
Yogi Devendra created APEXMALHAR-2369:
-
Summary: S3 output module for tuple based output
Key: APEXMALHAR-2369
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2369
Project: Apache Apex Malhar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra resolved APEXMALHAR-2302.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.6.0
> Exposing few propert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra resolved APEXMALHAR-2312.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.6.0
> NullPointerExcept
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-1818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15548137#comment-15548137
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXMALHAR-1818:
---
Reviewed the PR. Given some comments
Yogi Devendra created APEXMALHAR-2266:
-
Summary: Documentation for quasi java expressions
Key: APEXMALHAR-2266
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2266
Project: Apache Apex
Yogi Devendra created APEXMALHAR-2237:
-
Summary: Dynamic partitioning support for FSInputModule
Key: APEXMALHAR-2237
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2237
Project: Apache Apex
Yogi Devendra created APEXMALHAR-2234:
-
Summary: Add user documentation for FilterOperator
Key: APEXMALHAR-2234
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2234
Project: Apache Apex
Congratulations !!!
~ Yogi
On 13 September 2016 at 10:30, Tushar Gosavi wrote:
> Congratulations Chandni
>
> - Tushar.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Bhupesh Chawda
> wrote:
> > Congrats Chandni!
> >
> > ~ Bhupesh
> >
> > On Tue, Sep
me existing library for parsing. There is no
> point in re-inventing the wheels and trying to make something robust can be
> time consuming.
>
> -Chinmay.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Yogi Devendra <
> devendra.vyavah...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Appro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15470073#comment-15470073
]
Yogi Devendra edited comment on APEXMALHAR-2224 at 9/7/16 8:59 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15470073#comment-15470073
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXMALHAR-2224:
---
One possible solution could be:
check
Yogi Devendra created APEXMALHAR-2224:
-
Summary: GenericFileOutputOperator rotateCall fails if no data is
written to the file
Key: APEXMALHAR-2224
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2224
+1
Checked for
- Signatures
- No binary files
- Rat check and build passed
~ Yogi
On 29 August 2016 at 10:29, Thomas Weise wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> Please vote on the following Apache Apex Malhar 3.5.0 release candidate.
>
> This is a source release with binary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15445329#comment-15445329
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXMALHAR-2206:
---
Should we mark fix version as 3.5.0
Yogi Devendra created APEXMALHAR-2207:
-
Summary: JsonFormatterTest application test should check for
presence of expected results
Key: APEXMALHAR-2207
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439309#comment-15439309
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXMALHAR-2206:
---
Yes. It has
ConsoleOutputOperator output
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439220#comment-15439220
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXMALHAR-2206:
---
I propose to create separate newbie ticket
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439215#comment-15439215
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXMALHAR-2206:
---
Problem regarding anti pattern in the unit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra resolved APEXMALHAR-2206.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Some Application tests taking too l
Fix for APEXMALHAR-2206 has been reviewed and merged into asf master.
~ Yogi
On 26 August 2016 at 19:04, Yogi Devendra <devendra.vyavah...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> We noticed that lc.runAsync() is called without corresponding
> lc.shutdown() at couple of places in unit tests.
>
>
I propose alternate approach to than the 3 options mentioned above:
In AbstractFileOutputOperator we can introduce one flag saying
isFileSystemAppendSupported.
This flag should be set based on the filePath in setup or activate method.
It can be done in 2 ways:
1. Adding if else rules based on
; > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Chaitanya
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Priyanka Gugale <
> > priya...@datatorrent.com
> > >> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > APEXMA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra updated APEXMALHAR-2195:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.5.0
> LineReaderContext gives incorrect results for fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra updated APEXMALHAR-2198:
--
Assignee: (was: Yogi Devendra)
> ReaderContext should handle differ
I tried 30 sec which worked well.
~ Yogi
On 18 August 2016 at 22:28, Munagala Ramanath <r...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity what is the smallest value that fixes the issue ?
>
> Ram
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Yogi Devendra <yogideven...@apach
Hi,
Current default value is 2000 ms.
I tried an application which uses default value. It was noticed that it
leads to continuous re-deployment of the operator. Reason could be because
2000 ms is not sufficient for re-deploy+reaching some steady state.
How about changing default to 30 sec or 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15422518#comment-15422518
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXMALHAR-2196:
---
This module will be similar in functionality
Yogi Devendra created APEXMALHAR-2196:
-
Summary: S3 Record reader module
Key: APEXMALHAR-2196
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2196
Project: Apache Apex Malhar
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15422467#comment-15422467
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXMALHAR-2195:
---
ReaderContext.LineReaderContext not able
Yogi Devendra created APEXMALHAR-2195:
-
Summary: LineReaderContext gives incorrect results for files not
ending with the newline
Key: APEXMALHAR-2195
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2195
d all the time. When such case arise, the
> user can always configure empty string as delimiter in the operator he
> would prefer to.
>
> -Venkatesh.
>
>
> > On Aug 12, 2016, at 10:08 PM, Yogi Devendra <
> devendra.vyavah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > @V
19:09, Venkatesh Kottapalli <
> venkat...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > IMO, since we have an option to configure the line delimiter, leaving it
> to the user is a good idea as there might be cases where either one of them
> is used and not both.
> >
> >
Hi,
Currently, for the usecases involving writing POJO to file output we use
DAG simillar to following:
POJOEmittingOperator->CSVFormatter->StringFileOutputOperator.
Both CSVFormatter as well as StringFileOutputOperator have
configurable tupleSeperator defaulting to newline. This introduces two
Congratulations Dev !!!
~ Yogi
On 11 August 2016 at 11:37, Chinmay Kolhatkar
wrote:
> Congrats Dev!!
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Shubham Pathak
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Dev !
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shubham
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 11,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra updated APEXMALHAR-2161:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.5.0
> Add tests for AbstractThroughputFileInputOpera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra resolved APEXMALHAR-2161.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Add tests for AbstractThroughputFileInputOpera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra updated APEXMALHAR-2174:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.5.0
> S3 File Reader reading more data than expec
+1 for Tushar's idea for common abstract class.
Additionally, POJO based output should be considered for active
development. CSV output can be deprecated. Since it can be achieved easily
using POJO + CSV formatter.
Operators are meant to be lego blocks for reusable functionality to achieve
l 29, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Yogi Devendra <
> devendra.vyavah...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > APEXMALHAR-2116
> > https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/326
> >
> > @Ram
> > Your review comments are incorporated. Could you please have a look at
> > thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15408917#comment-15408917
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXCORE-501:
Link for the discussion:
https://lists.apache.org
Yogi Devendra created APEXCORE-501:
--
Summary: Sub Partitioning the parallel partitions
Key: APEXCORE-501
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-501
Project: Apache Apex Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15407815#comment-15407815
]
Yogi Devendra edited comment on APEXMALHAR-2176 at 8/4/16 2:10 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15407815#comment-15407815
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXMALHAR-2176:
---
additional setter method for listItem
Yogi Devendra created APEXMALHAR-2175:
-
Summary: POJOUtils is considering java reserved words as fields in
the expression
Key: APEXMALHAR-2175
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2175
This will be awesome feature. I can see the usecases for production
scenario as well as developement/troubleshooting environments.
Excellent value add.
~ Yogi
On 4 August 2016 at 12:40, Sandesh Hegde wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> This thread is to discuss the Named
APEXMALHAR-2116
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/326
@Ram
Your review comments are incorporated. Could you please have a look at this?
~ Yogi
On 29 July 2016 at 13:49, Thomas Weise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would suggest to target the 3.5.0 release with an RC out
+1 for Windowed Operator if we manage to take care of the problem you
mentioned for this approach in the earlier email.
IMO, "WindowedStorage to suit the dedup use case" would open up ways for
any other similar use-cases for Windowed Operators which needs some custom
handling.
-1 for keeping
Hi,
I am working on creating example app
for com.datatorrent.lib.filter.FilterOperator
For condition property, I gave following value:
{$}.getAmount() >= 2
This gives following exception:
java.lang.RuntimeException: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException:
Line 1, Column 29: Cannot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra resolved APEXMALHAR-2019.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Creation of S3 Input Mod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra updated APEXMALHAR-2019:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.5.0
> Creation of S3 Input Mod
+1 for merging and incremental additions.
~ Yogi
On 11 July 2016 at 11:04, Chinmay Kolhatkar wrote:
> +1 on merging.
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Amol Kekre wrote:
>
> > +1 on merging it. This is a big feature addition.
> >
> > Thks
> >
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yogi Devendra updated APEXMALHAR-2104:
--
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> input ports in BytesFileOutputOperator sho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15309364#comment-15309364
]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXMALHAR-2104:
---
input port used for byte[] is defined
Hi,
Here is my scenario:
1. Class A with DefaultInputPort input.
2. Class B extends A with DefaultInputPort stringInput.
3. Class A does NOT define optional=true for input.
4. In Class B, I want to specify that any one of input, stringInput should
be connected.
(OR making both of them as
70 matches
Mail list logo