Re: Windowed Operator PR

+1 on merging it. This is a big feature addition. Thks Amol On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Siyuan Hua wrote: > +1 > > We should merge this ASAP. > I don't think we could solve all the problems in one PR and I think David's > PR is good enough that we can keep working

Re: Why the setSink method takes Object instead of Type

Siyuan, I am not able to remember right now. Chetan or Thomas may remember. Even casting a tuple from upstream port or to downstream port it should work if both the above apis are . As of today, I cannot see a reason why we did this. Thks Amol On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Siyuan Hua

Re: [DISCUSSION] Custom Control Tuples

I did not say that "notably" does not mean "exclusive" Thks Amol On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Sandesh Hegde <sand...@datatorrent.com> wrote: > Why restrict the control tuples to input operators? > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:07 AM Amol Kekre <a.

[jira] [Commented] (APEXCORE-417) Web site: Improve landing page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15346791#comment-15346791 ] Amol Kekre commented on APEXCORE-417: - We should take a look at the following sites as examples

Update to apex.apache.org site?

Wanted to see what the community thinks of re-design off apex.apache.org site. Do comment on "Is is time to do a re-design". If we all think it is time for a re-design given that Apex is top level project, here are some thoughts that IMHO should be taken up. - Have a powered by Apex page - Bring

Re: A proposal for Malhar

Agreed Thks Amol On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Pramod Immaneni <pra...@datatorrent.com> wrote: > Amol, > > I would suggest starting a separate thread for that discussion. > > Thanks > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Amol Kekre <a...@datatorrent.com&g

Re: A proposal for Malhar

A separate directory conveys "new code; not cleared all checklisted items" much better and stronger than evolving within the same dir. There are examples like PiggyBank that achieved similar results. As Hitesh pointed out, licensing compliance will need to be checked. Thks, Amol On Fri, May 27,

Re: A proposal for Malhar

I am in favor of contrib too as long as it did not imply "license incompatible" issue in other Apache projects. I found the following https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/pig-user/201205.mbox/%3CCAB-acjMTZUy=8skp+aqdm4rj1ordbxynvjnmsfymjsdfdvp...@mail.gmail.com%3E

Re: A proposal for Malhar

This is a very good idea and will greatly help contributors. The requirements to submit code to this Malhar folder should be very minimal. A few that come to my mind - Should compile - License of the external lib (if any) should be Apache compliant license // Need to see if this is part of ASF

<    1   2