+1 for option 1.
Thank you,
Vlad
On 6/24/16 14:35, Bright Chen wrote:
+1
It also can help to Shutdown the application gracefully.
Bright
On Jun 24, 2016, at 1:35 PM, Siyuan Hua wrote:
+1
I think it's good to have custom control tuple and I prefer the 1 option.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15348844#comment-15348844
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2085:
Github user brightchen commented on a diff
Github user brightchen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/319#discussion_r68475212
--- Diff:
library/src/main/java/org/apache/apex/malhar/lib/window/Window.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/351
@siyuanh @tushargosavi please see as you have expressed interest in JIRA
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user chinmaykolhatkar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/319#discussion_r68474418
--- Diff:
library/src/main/java/org/apache/apex/malhar/lib/window/impl/AbstractWindowedOperator.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,486 @@
+/**
+ *
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15348824#comment-15348824
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-405:
-
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15348800#comment-15348800
]
David Yan commented on APEXCORE-475:
In a development environment, yes, that can be an issue.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15348793#comment-15348793
]
Sandesh commented on APEXCORE-475:
--
They can be using RTS 3.4, but launching the apps using 3.5 Apex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15348758#comment-15348758
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2085:
Github user chinmaykolhatkar commented on a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15348743#comment-15348743
]
David Yan commented on APEXCORE-475:
We don't expect users to have multiple Apex installations with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
bright chen resolved APEXMALHAR-2120.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Fix bugs on KafkaInputOperatorTest and
+1
It also can help to Shutdown the application gracefully.
Bright
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 1:35 PM, Siyuan Hua wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I think it's good to have custom control tuple and I prefer the 1 option.
>
> Also I think we should think about couple different callbacks,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15348699#comment-15348699
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2120:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/321
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15348653#comment-15348653
]
David Yan commented on APEXCORE-475:
If we change the application type to ApacheApex for all newly
My initial thinking is that the custom control tuples, just like the
existing control tuples, will only be generated from the input operators
and will be propagated downstream to all operators in the DAG. So the NxM
partitioning scenario works just like how other control tuples work, i.e.
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15348583#comment-15348583
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2085:
Github user davidyan74 commented on a diff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15348582#comment-15348582
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2085:
Github user davidyan74 commented on a diff
Github user davidyan74 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/319#discussion_r68450198
--- Diff:
library/src/main/java/org/apache/apex/malhar/lib/window/impl/KeyedWindowedOperatorImpl.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+/**
+ *
Github user siyuanh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/321#discussion_r68420530
--- Diff:
kafka/src/test/java/org/apache/apex/malhar/kafka/KafkaInputOperatorTest.java ---
@@ -264,49 +336,57 @@ public void testInputOperator(boolean
GitHub user PramodSSImmaneni opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/351
APEXCORE-405 Common API to launch on local mode or cluster
@tweise please take a look.
Common API to launch on local mode or cluster. No functionality lost in
local mode but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15347935#comment-15347935
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-405:
-
GitHub user PramodSSImmaneni opened a pull request:
22 matches
Mail list logo