I tried 30 sec which worked well.
~ Yogi
On 18 August 2016 at 22:28, Munagala Ramanath wrote:
> Just out of curiosity what is the smallest value that fixes the issue ?
>
> Ram
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Yogi Devendra
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
gaurav gupta updated APEXCORE-507:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: [~davidyan]: Is it not same as startedTime returned as part of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427296#comment-15427296
]
gaurav gupta commented on APEXCORE-507:
---
[~davidyan]: Is it not same as startedTime returned as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
bright chen updated APEXMALHAR-2190:
Description:
Spillable Data Structure created lots of temporary memory to serial data
GitHub user brightchen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/375
Apexmalhar-2190 shared memory for serialize - review only
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/brightchen/apex-malhar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427110#comment-15427110
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2028:
Github user siyuanh closed the pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427111#comment-15427111
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2028:
GitHub user siyuanh reopened a pull request:
GitHub user siyuanh reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/365
APEXMALHAR-2028 #resolve #comment add stderr for ConsoleOperator
Add stderr to ConsleOutputOperator
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user siyuanh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/365
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427103#comment-15427103
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2182:
Github user brightchen closed the pull
Github user brightchen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/370
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siyuan Hua updated APEXMALHAR-2168:
---
Summary: The setter method for double field is not generated correctly in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siyuan Hua updated APEXMALHAR-2168:
---
Summary: The in JdbcPOJOInputOperator. (was: Bug Found in
JdbcPOJOInputOperator.)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427067#comment-15427067
]
David Yan commented on APEXMALHAR-2168:
---
[~siyuan] or [~lushun...@gmail.com]: Please change the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
bright chen updated APEXMALHAR-2197:
Description:
When there are lots of keys and large throughput, the following exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15426932#comment-15426932
]
Vlad Rozov commented on APEXCORE-510:
-
- Changing emit() to be final breaks backward compatibility.
Just out of curiosity what is the smallest value that fixes the issue ?
Ram
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Yogi Devendra
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Current default value is 2000 ms.
>
> I tried an application which uses default value. It was noticed that it
> leads to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15426793#comment-15426793
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2197:
GitHub user brightchen opened a pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise resolved APEXCORE-502.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.5.0
> Unnecessary byte array copy in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15426719#comment-15426719
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-502:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/370
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15426497#comment-15426497
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2154:
GitHub user chaithu14 opened a pull request:
GitHub user chaithu14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/373
APEXMALHAR-2154 Update the Kafka Input Operator to use
CheckpointNotificationListener
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Hi,
Current default value is 2000 ms.
I tried an application which uses default value. It was noticed that it
leads to continuous re-deployment of the operator. Reason could be because
2000 ms is not sufficient for re-deploy+reaching some steady state.
How about changing default to 30 sec or 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15426090#comment-15426090
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2100:
GitHub user chaithu14 reopened a pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15426088#comment-15426088
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2100:
Github user chaithu14 closed the pull
GitHub user chaithu14 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/330
APEXMALHAR-2100 Implementation of Inner Join operator
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/chaithu14/incubator-apex-malhar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15426007#comment-15426007
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2195:
Github user yogidevendra closed the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chaitanya resolved APEXMALHAR-2158.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Duplication of data emitted when the Kafka Input Operator(0.8
29 matches
Mail list logo