[jira] [Commented] (APEXMALHAR-2234) Add user documentation for FilterOperator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15537787#comment-15537787 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2234: GitHub user yogidevendra reo

[jira] [Commented] (APEXMALHAR-2234) Add user documentation for FilterOperator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15537786#comment-15537786 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2234: Github user yogidevendra clo

[GitHub] apex-malhar pull request #409: APEXMALHAR-2234 FilterOperator documentation

GitHub user yogidevendra reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/409 APEXMALHAR-2234 FilterOperator documentation You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/yogidevendra/apex-malhar APEXMALHAR-22

[GitHub] apex-malhar pull request #409: APEXMALHAR-2234 FilterOperator documentation

Github user yogidevendra closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/409 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feat

[jira] [Commented] (APEXMALHAR-2223) Managed state should parallelize WAL writes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15537595#comment-15537595 ] Chandni Singh commented on APEXMALHAR-2223: --- IncrementalCheckpointManager u

[jira] [Commented] (APEXMALHAR-2223) Managed state should parallelize WAL writes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15537578#comment-15537578 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2223: GitHub user chandnisingh ope

[GitHub] apex-malhar pull request #438: APEXMALHAR-2223 ability to buffer data up to ...

GitHub user chandnisingh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/438 APEXMALHAR-2223 ability to buffer data up to a threshold and write it… … to wal when the threshold is reached. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $

[jira] [Commented] (APEXCORE-544) Latency values are out of whack immediately after app is launched

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15537459#comment-15537459 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-544: - GitHub user davidyan74 opened a pull

[GitHub] apex-core pull request #401: APEXCORE-544 #resolve fixed latency calculation...

GitHub user davidyan74 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/401 APEXCORE-544 #resolve fixed latency calculation when the upstream heartbeat is processed later than the downstream for a particular window @tweise please review. this fixes the problem with wh

[jira] [Moved] (APEXCORE-544) Latency values are out of whack immediately after app is launched

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Yan moved APEXMALHAR-2277 to APEXCORE-544: Workflow: jira (was: Default workflow, editable Closed status)

[jira] [Created] (APEXMALHAR-2277) Latency values are out of whack immediately after app is launched

David Yan created APEXMALHAR-2277: - Summary: Latency values are out of whack immediately after app is launched Key: APEXMALHAR-2277 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2277 Project:

[jira] [Resolved] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedState: value of a key does not get over-written in the same time bucket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Yan resolved APEXMALHAR-2276. --- Resolution: Fixed > ManagedState: value of a key does not get over-written in the same ti

[jira] [Updated] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedState: value of a key does not get over-written in the same time bucket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Yan updated APEXMALHAR-2276: -- Fix Version/s: 3.6.0 > ManagedState: value of a key does not get over-written in the same t

[jira] [Commented] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedState: value of a key does not get over-written in the same time bucket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15537346#comment-15537346 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2276: Github user asfgit closed th

[GitHub] apex-malhar pull request #437: APEXMALHAR-2276 over writing the value of a k...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/437 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (APEXCORE-543) Enhance the ContainerInfo to contain operator id and name.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15537267#comment-15537267 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-543: - GitHub user sandeshh opened a pull re

[GitHub] apex-core pull request #400: APEXCORE-543 ContainerInfo will contain Map of ...

GitHub user sandeshh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/400 APEXCORE-543 ContainerInfo will contain Map of operators, with Key re… …presenting Id and Value representing name. @davidyan74 please review. You can merge this pull request into a

[jira] [Created] (APEXCORE-543) Enhance the ContainerInfo to contain operator id and name.

Sandesh created APEXCORE-543: Summary: Enhance the ContainerInfo to contain operator id and name. Key: APEXCORE-543 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-543 Project: Apache Apex Core

Re: Apex Core PR

Apex Malhar PR validation is enabled for Apache Jenkins as well. Vlad On 9/7/16 14:51, Vlad Rozov wrote: Please note that I added Apex Core PR validation to the Apache Jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/job/Apex_Core_PR/. I'll add Apex Malhar later unless somebody volunteers to pick this item.

[jira] [Commented] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedState: value of a key does not get over-written in the same time bucket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15536907#comment-15536907 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2276: GitHub user chandnisingh ope

[GitHub] apex-malhar pull request #437: APEXMALHAR-2276 over writing the value of a k...

GitHub user chandnisingh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/437 APEXMALHAR-2276 over writing the value of a key in the same time bucket @davidyan74 @ilooner please review and merge since you are familiar with ManagedState code You can merge this pull

[jira] [Updated] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedState: value of a key does not get over-written in the same time bucket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chandni Singh updated APEXMALHAR-2276: -- Summary: ManagedState: value of a key does not get over-written in the same time bu

[jira] [Updated] (APEXMALHAR-2273) Retraction trigger is fired incorrectly when fireOnlyUpdatedPanes is true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Yan updated APEXMALHAR-2273: -- Description: Retraction trigger is fired incorrectly if the retraction value is the same as

[jira] [Updated] (APEXMALHAR-2273) Retraction trigger is fired incorrectly when fireOnlyUpdatedPanes is true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Yan updated APEXMALHAR-2273: -- Summary: Retraction trigger is fired incorrectly when fireOnlyUpdatedPanes is true (was: R

[jira] [Commented] (APEXMALHAR-2273) Retraction trigger is fired if the retraction value is the same as the current value and when fireOnlyUpdatedPanes is true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15536839#comment-15536839 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2273: GitHub user davidyan74 opene

[GitHub] apex-malhar pull request #436: APEXMALHAR-2273 #resolve do not fire retracti...

GitHub user davidyan74 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/436 APEXMALHAR-2273 #resolve do not fire retraction trigger if retraction… … value is same as current value and fireOnlyUpdatedPanes is true @siyuanh please merge You can merge thi

[GitHub] apex-malhar pull request #435: Update README.md

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/435 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] apex-malhar pull request #337: Removed deployment documentation as it is inc...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/337 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Updated] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl: value of a key does not get over-written in the same time bucket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chandni Singh updated APEXMALHAR-2276: -- Summary: ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl: value of a key does not get over-written in t

[jira] [Updated] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl doesn't support time events properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chandni Singh updated APEXMALHAR-2276: -- Issue Type: Bug (was: Sub-task) Parent: (was: APEXMALHAR-2130) > Manag

[GitHub] apex-malhar pull request #435: Update README.md

GitHub user tweise opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/435 Update README.md @davidyan74 please merge You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/tweise/apex-malhar readme Alternatively you can re

[jira] [Updated] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl doesn't support time events properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chandni Singh updated APEXMALHAR-2276: -- Assignee: Chandni Singh > ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl doesn't support time events p

[jira] [Commented] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl doesn't support time events properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15536587#comment-15536587 ] Siyuan Hua commented on APEXMALHAR-2276: The problem is in the DefaultBucket

[jira] [Commented] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl doesn't support time events properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15536550#comment-15536550 ] David Yan commented on APEXMALHAR-2276: --- [~csingh] Any thoughts? > ManagedTime

[jira] [Updated] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl doesn't support time events properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siyuan Hua updated APEXMALHAR-2276: --- Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug) Parent: APEXMALHAR-2130 > ManagedTimeUnifiedStat

[jira] [Created] (APEXMALHAR-2275) ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl doesn't support time events properly

Siyuan Hua created APEXMALHAR-2275: -- Summary: ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl doesn't support time events properly Key: APEXMALHAR-2275 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2275 Project:

[jira] [Created] (APEXMALHAR-2276) ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl doesn't support time events properly

Siyuan Hua created APEXMALHAR-2276: -- Summary: ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl doesn't support time events properly Key: APEXMALHAR-2276 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2276 Project: