Hi Jürgen,
thank you for the explanations. Should I file a issue for the PDF thing?
Greetings, Tobias
Juergen Schmidt schrieb:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> the whole extension mechanism evolved over the time. I agree that the
> API should fail for files that can't be installed in general like a PDF.
> The
Hi Tobias,
the whole extension mechanism evolved over the time. I agree that the
API should fail for files that can't be installed in general like a PDF.
The other things are not so easy to decide. A missing description.xml is
still a valid extension package. The description.xml was introduced
Hi together,
I deploy my OXT via Java API. And I created some unit tests. One is for
checking failure behaviour: e.g. I try to install a PDF or other non-OXT
and it works! Is this correct behaviour?
Checking if the PDF file is installed returns false. But the Extension
Manager Dialogue shows the P
