Re: [api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-11-03 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 11/03/10 09:22, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 11/3/10 9:04 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 11/03/10 08:30, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Please take care of this in the future and use the new defined rule @since OOo.[.], only if> 0 care to update

Re: [api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-11-03 Thread Frank Schönheit
>> What about autodoc enforcing this? Since autodoc is ran in the odk >> module, not following the rule would break the build ... > could be a next step ;-) http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115368 Ciao Frank -- ORACLE Frank Schönheit | Software Engineer | frank.schoenh...@oracle

Re: [api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-11-03 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 11/3/10 9:04 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 11/03/10 08:30, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Please take care of this in the future and use the new defined rule >> >> @since OOo.[.], only if> 0 > > care to update > accordingly? i will do th

Re: [api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-11-03 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 11/3/10 8:56 AM, Frank Schönheit wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > >> Please take care of this in the future and use the new defined rule >> >> @since OOo .[.], only if > 0 > > (I doubt many people will read this, buried here in this thread :) ) > > What about autodoc enforcing this? Since autodoc is ra

Re: [api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-11-03 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 11/03/10 08:30, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Please take care of this in the future and use the new defined rule @since OOo.[.], only if> 0 care to update accordingly? -Stephan

Re: [api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-11-03 Thread Frank Schönheit
Hi Jürgen, > Please take care of this in the future and use the new defined rule > > @since OOo .[.], only if > 0 (I doubt many people will read this, buried here in this thread :) ) What about autodoc enforcing this? Since autodoc is ran in the odk module, not following the rule would break t

Re: [api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-11-03 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Hi, i have cleaned up the IDLs on the dev300 codeline. The @since tags were indeed used different all over in our IDL files. I have unified the usage based on the following: - use @since OOo .[.] is used only if > 0 Examples: @since OOo 2.0 @since OOo 2.3 @since OOo 2.3.1 @since OOo 3.0 @since

Re: [api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-10-29 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 10/29/10 1:21 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 10/29/10 12:17, Bernard Marcelly wrote: >> For the latest version 3.3.0 I found these variants, on various IDLs: >> >> @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 >> @since OOo 3.3 >> @since OOo 3.3.0 >> @since OOo3.3 >> @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 >> >> Please, API de

Re: [api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-10-29 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/29/10 12:17, Bernard Marcelly wrote: For the latest version 3.3.0 I found these variants, on various IDLs: @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 @since OOo 3.3 @since OOo 3.3.0 @since OOo3.3 @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 Please, API developers, could you stick to one rule ? :-)