Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi,
From some threads in the mail archive, I reed it is possible to
replace a uno function by one you define yourself.
But the example(s) I find are about a component written in Java.
Is it possible to do replace UNO:Paste also in OOo-Basic?
I think that the devGuide [1]
Thanks all for help,
I will try to get it running :-)
Greetings
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Bernard Marcelly marce...@club-internet.fr
To: dev@api.openoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [api-dev] Problem with my Eventhandler under OOWriter 3.x
Hi Benjamin,
The property Step is found on the model of the dialog and on the model
of each control.
See Developer's Guide, section Graphical User Interfaces Dialog
Creation and its sub-sections.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/GUI/Dialog_Creation
Regards
Hello,
in my extension written in java I load dialogs which I created with the
OOo dialog editor via XDialogProvider.createDialog(). Now I want to
access the properties of one dialog which should offer a wizard
functionality. For this purpose I need the property step. Is it
possible to get
Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi,
From some threads in the mail archive, I reed it is possible to replace
a uno function by one you define yourself.
But the example(s) I find are about a component written in Java.
Is it possible to do replace UNO:Paste also in OOo-Basic?
Unfotrunately not, as the
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
I buy that. But as I said elsewhere, in my book there's a
fundamental difference between c++ extensions and e.g. Java- or
Python-based ones: it is *much* easier to break compatibility for
c++ extensions, and handling them suck when dealing with
cross-platform
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
I'd say we need a set of highly proficient and highly respected
architects, whose opinion should, at least, be weighted high.
No, please not!
Every code change can break something, so why should API changes be
treated differently? We should
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
I'd say we need a set of highly proficient and highly respected
architects, whose opinion should, at least, be weighted high.
No, please not!
Hi Mathias,
FWICT Frank was joking here. ;)
Of course (as for every
On 04/30/09 12:24, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
I'd say we need a set of highly proficient and highly respected
architects, whose opinion should, at least, be weighted high.
No, please not!
Every code change can break something, so why should API
Hi Cristina,
Cristina Scheau wrote:
Hello!
Is there a complete example with the Tree control from star.awt.tree
package? (preferably in Java).
there is some information on this page [1] on the OOo wiki, though the
code is C++.
As an alternative, I wrote some treecontrol Java code for a
Hi Cor, Carsten,
Carsten Driesner ha scritto:
Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi,
From some threads in the mail archive, I reed it is possible to
replace a uno function by one you define yourself.
But the example(s) I find are about a component written in Java.
Is it possible to do replace UNO:Paste
Hi Mathias,
I'd say we need a set of highly proficient and highly respected
architects, whose opinion should, at least, be weighted high.
No, please not!
Actually I wasn't kidding as much as Thorsten supposed :-\
No, I do not really think that a formal process such as 3 out of those
5
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
I'd say we need a set of highly proficient and highly respected
architects, whose opinion should, at least, be weighted high.
No, please not!
... same opinion here, please don't let's roll off responsibility!
Every
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Of course (as for every code change) you should do that accountably and
talk to other developers that will be influenced by your changes and you
should try to make your changes in a way that the potential work of
others is minimized.
But please
Paolo Mantovani wrote:
Hi Cor, Carsten,
Carsten Driesner ha scritto:
Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi,
From some threads in the mail archive, I reed it is possible to
replace a uno function by one you define yourself.
But the example(s) I find are about a component written in Java.
Is it possible
Mathias Bauer wrote (30-4-2009 17:02)
Yes, exactly this doesn't make that a reliable way and it lets me
discourage everybody to do it.
Perhaps we should again think about the macro bound dispatch objects?
Would ease life a lot.
In a former life, I just could write a macro with the name
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/30/09 12:24, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
I'd say we need a set of highly proficient and highly respected
architects, whose opinion should, at least, be weighted high.
No, please not!
Every code change can break
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Sorry, I stay with this: API should be as good as reasonably possible
*before* put into the MWS, or even a release. And this requires
discussion, most of the time.
No objection. I just don't want to have any formal process. Announcing a
18 matches
Mail list logo
