Re: [api-dev] Interface classes: assumptions correct?

2005-08-15 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi Rony, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi there, are the following few assumptions correct? * Interface class names in UNO always start with a capital X only. yes But note that this is only a convention. For the OOo (and URE) UNO APIs, this convention will

Re: [api-dev] Interface classes: assumptions correct?

2005-08-15 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Stephan, are the following few assumptions correct? * Interface class names in UNO always start with a capital X only. yes But note that this is only a convention. For the OOo (and URE) UNO APIs, this convention will probably always be followed---but in general, UNO and UNOIDL

Re: [api-dev] Interface classes: assumptions correct?

2005-08-15 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Stephan, are the following few assumptions correct? * Interface class names in UNO always start with a capital X only. yes But note that this is only a convention. For the OOo (and URE) UNO APIs, this convention will probably always be followed---but

Re: [api-dev] Interface classes: assumptions correct?

2005-08-03 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Hi Rony, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi there, are the following few assumptions correct? * Interface class names in UNO always start with a capital X only. yes * Interface classes must not have fields (they consist of methods only). no, the was the recommendation in the past but with

[api-dev] Interface classes: assumptions correct?

2005-08-02 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, are the following few assumptions correct? Interface class names in UNO always start with a capital X only. Interface classes must not have fields (they consist of methods only). TIA, ---rony