Re: controlling the flavor of lock used by APR

2000-11-30 Thread rbb
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Jeff Trawick wrote: Does anyone have thoughts on what should be done in hints.m4 to set the flavor of lock for a certain platform? Why do you want to do this? I'm not yet sure how to change the configure.in logic but it can't be too hard :) This logic is a bit

Re: controlling the flavor of lock used by APR

2000-11-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Jeff Trawick wrote: Does anyone have thoughts on what should be done in hints.m4 to set the flavor of lock for a certain platform? Why do you want to do this? For the same reason we had USE_xyz_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT in 1.3: because certain

[PATCH] controlling the flavor of lock used by APR

2000-11-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
Important note: the hints.m4 change is just an example... I won't commit a change for Linux, but will do so for OS/390 before I commit... To tailor the lock method, in hints.m4 set the apr_lock_method variable to one of the USE_xxx_SERIALIZE symbols and magic will happen. Any remaining

Re: [PATCH] controlling the flavor of lock used by APR

2000-11-30 Thread rbb
On 30 Nov 2000, Jeff Trawick wrote: Important note: the hints.m4 change is just an example... I won't commit a change for Linux, but will do so for OS/390 before I commit... Please use the APR_SETVAR syntax for setting variables in hints.m4. This keeps everything looking the same.

Re: controlling the flavor of lock used by APR

2000-11-30 Thread rbb
This would be moving backwards. This test was originally after the FCNTL test, but we moved it, I can't remember why. Please look this up before making this change. of course you're right about the order! Would you mind clueing me in as to why I was right? Ryan

Re: controlling the flavor of lock used by APR

2000-11-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This would be moving backwards. This test was originally after the FCNTL test, but we moved it, I can't remember why. Please look this up before making this change. of course you're right about the order! Would you mind clueing me in as to why I was