[Note: My connectivity is quite limited currently.. ]
Somewhat... but it does mean that we'd be looking down into .libs for the
libraries to put into NON_LIBTOOL_LIBS. Not sure what I think about that
one... (reaching into .libs is the basic question: do we or don't we?)
Am I correct
I've done a ton of thinking about these issues.
1) Once Greg finishes his fine work exporting symbols, we need
no def files whatsoever for our dll (or certainly no symbol
names, even if we keep them for versioning/descriptions.)
2) We should simply build the sources in both static and
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 12:54:09PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
One of the reasons that I was advocating using the globbing feature of
case was to avoid the nasty sed expression.
Just do:
case `uname -r` in
3.4*)
have we decided what we're going to do about mm and linking? It's totally
screwed in BeOS at present (no surprise there really!) Could we make it a
convenience library and then link against it for shmem?
david
The ALL_LIBS things shouldn't have been necessary. $(LINK) includes $(LIBS)
already, so it should have been possible to simply add libmm.la to the LIBS
line.
That would keep the makefile much simpler...
Cheers,
-g
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:41:30PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick
Items that are basically ready and waiting for removal of the freeze, into
the STATUS file in a separate section or a new file?
david
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 9:30 PM
Subject: Feature Freeze
APR's development
