On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 01:01:01AM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
From: Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If there are licensing concerns with Mozilla's code in my experience the
Mozilla lawyers will do whatever it takes to resolve the differences so
that
the code can be used.
The
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Notes regarding HP-UX compilation with latest CVS snapshots
of httpd-2.0, apr, and apr-util:
config.guess: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
uname: HP-UX B.11.00 U 9000/800
HP's Ansi C compiler (non-free): HP C/HP-UX Version A.11.01.00
MPM: prefork
Let
From: Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would actually be quite interesting to see APR ported to build against
STM and see what happens when the threaded MPM is thrown against APR/STM.
Could this be taken even further and merge APR and NSPR into a single
run-time library? There is
--- Jeff Trawick said:
(by the way, we don't build with the HP compiler on HP 10.20; need to
look lots further into which compiler I have access to and why it
doesn't like some seemingly benign declarations in APR)
That doesn't surprise me... HP-UX's native compiler has been known to do
some
Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Jeff Trawick said:
(by the way, we don't build with the HP compiler on HP 10.20; need to
look lots further into which compiler I have access to and why it
doesn't like some seemingly benign declarations in APR)
That doesn't surprise me...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Index: Makefile.in
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.40
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -r1.40 -r1.41
--- Makefile.in 2001/02/16 10:17:10 1.40
I've reversed those changes.
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 03:35:18PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Index: Makefile.in
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.40
