Re: Problems with APR under Linux...

2001-05-19 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: I'm a dork, I sent it only to Bill without including the mailing list... Damn lack of a Reply-To header :) :) Pier [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ ./httpd Syntax error

databases in APRUTIL (was: apr_xml)

2001-05-19 Thread Greg Stein
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:19:28AM +0100, David Reid wrote: Seems like a good idea. Yes, but somebody just has to do it. That is: somebody with an itch. Did we ever do anything about defining/writing code for a common apr interface to databases. No, although it would be a nice addition.

Re: Problems with APR under Linux...

2001-05-19 Thread Greg Stein
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 01:05:17AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: I'm a dork, I sent it only to Bill without including the mailing list... Damn lack of a

Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_sms.c

2001-05-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On 19 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- apr_sms.c 2001/05/19 13:53:06 1.3 +++ apr_sms.c 2001/05/19 15:35:45 1.4 @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ mem_sys-accounting_mem_sys = mem_sys; if (parent_mem_sys != NULL){ -if (mem_sys-sibling_mem_sys =

[PATCH] problem with apr_sms.c commit

2001-05-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
I think that some syntax and renaming stuff slipped through on the recent commit to apr_sms.c. This gets it compiling again. This seems to be what the intention was, but Dave and Sander would know for sure. -- justin Index: include/apr_sms.h

Re: cvs commit: apr/misc/unix errorcodes.c

2001-05-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On 19 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- apr_errno.h 2001/05/13 12:03:28 1.62 +++ apr_errno.h 2001/05/19 13:53:06 1.63 @@ -180,9 +180,11 @@ * APR_EGENERAL General failure (specific information not available) * APR_EBADIP The specified IP address is

Re: [PATCH] problem with apr_sms.c commit

2001-05-19 Thread Ben Laurie
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: I think that some syntax and renaming stuff slipped through on the recent commit to apr_sms.c. This gets it compiling again. This seems to be what the intention was, but Dave and Sander would know for sure. Ah. I already fixed this a different way (my first commit