On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 02:16:48PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Sander Striker wrote:
>
> > Maybe a bit off topic, but are there still legal issues with
> > DES implementations? I mean, if someone submitted a patch
> > would it be possible to include des in apr-util/crypto, or
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Sander Striker wrote:
> Maybe a bit off topic, but are there still legal issues with
> DES implementations? I mean, if someone submitted a patch
> would it be possible to include des in apr-util/crypto, or
> would this be problematic. DES is still in use in a variety
> of thing
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
>
> I believe this would break type saftey. These are very carefully constructed
> to
> ensure that the proper hook fn is registered for the appropriate hook.
In fact, it won't break type safety (there was none in the first place
in this statement, so it can't).
I
Hi,
Maybe a bit off topic, but are there still legal issues with
DES implementations? I mean, if someone submitted a patch
would it be possible to include des in apr-util/crypto, or
would this be problematic. DES is still in use in a variety
of things, so providing the functionality wouldn't be th
