Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
[]
> srvsvcd's job is also to handle the dependencies for service startup.
>
> we could look at the linux kernel 'Calculating module dependencies'
> code to get an algorithm to work out the startup order.
Why, why, why this is needed Why not to use runt
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > -*cp = '\0';
> > > +*(cp + len) = '\0';
> >
> > Err, cp[len]='\0', perlease!
>
> Let's make a deal. You rewire yourself to "fix" the
>
> rettype function(parms)
> {
> decl;
>
> code;
> }
>
> thang
This is NOT ready to be committed and in fact it may be a complete waste of
time. I had a
few minutes to hack around a couple of days back and came up with this. I did
not even
attempt to compile the unix implementation of ap_file_namedpipe_create() much
less run it.
The Windows implementation
+1 :-)
> Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > -*cp = '\0';
> > > +*(cp + len) = '\0';
> >
> > Err, cp[len]='\0', perlease!
>
> Let's make a deal. You rewire yourself to "fix" the
>
> rettype function(parms)
> {
> decl;
>
> code;
> }
>
> thang and I'll consi
Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > -*cp = '\0';
> > +*(cp + len) = '\0';
>
> Err, cp[len]='\0', perlease!
Let's make a deal. You rewire yourself to "fix" the
rettype function(parms)
{
decl;
code;
}
thang and I'll consider using array notation in code like that
Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> > Err, cp[len]='\0', perlease!
>
> ok.
>
> > Its probably worth a fraction of a microsecond (or more) to put this at
> > the end, btw.
>
> at the end, like this? interested, how is it faster?
Because of caching - the right
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Err, cp[len]='\0', perlease!
ok.
> Its probably worth a fraction of a microsecond (or more) to put this at
> the end, btw.
at the end, like this? interested, how is it faster?
--- srclib/apr/strings/apr_strings.c2001/06/19 20:40:22 1.14
+++ s
From: "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 8:55 AM
> > You miss my point. We at _least_ need to return a "Windows Acceptable Pipe
> > Name", instead
> > of some /PIPE/pluming style name.
>
> it is *important* that NT-style conventions are followed.
Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> On 19 Jun 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> > cp doesn't point to the end of the string to be built yet. If you had
> >
> > *(cp + len) = '\0';
> >
> > then I'd believe you.
>
> oh right, here is the current patch..
>
> --- srclib/apr/strings/apr_strings.c2001/05/1
> You miss my point. We at _least_ need to return a "Windows Acceptable Pipe
> Name", instead
> of some /PIPE/pluming style name.
it is *important* that NT-style conventions are followed.
the 'guiding light' *must* be the NT functions.
i know that most of you may find this difficult to accept
this may be of interest to people, so i'm fowarding it here,
from joe little.
I saw this today and wanted to post it here for future reference. It is
likely of great interest to the members here...
http://www.idealx.org/en/doc/chrooted-ssh-cvs-server/chrooted-ssh-cvs-server_monobloc.html
This Ho
[this message, which originated from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
is cross-posted from apr dev and samba tech. the relevance
to apr dev is the issues / justification of creating an
apr NamedPipe interface - exactly mirroring the NT NamedPipe one
_not_ the unix namedpipe one. luke]
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > I guess MSVC doesn't warn about such things?? Beats the hell out of me.
> > Obviously we'd have seen it in a gcc warning if it were on the Unix
> > side...
>
> It's a level 4 (think -wall) warning on my msvc5. I try building at
> least once a
From: "Cliff Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 7:57 PM
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:30:13PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > > In the following lines from readwrite.c line 90, should the if()
> > > conditional clause really
Should mmap_setaside() really be copying the data into a pool? That means
that, for example, that things like the content_length filter could easily
end up reading in a really big file in its entirety to r->pool, AFAICT.
The only thing that the apr_mmap_t seems to need the pool for is its own
all
> > At this point, you are trying to second guess the bucket type. If the
> > bucket doesn't implement setaside, then it doesn't need setaside.
>
> That's not true... it it doesn't need setaside, it will use
> apr_bucket_setaside_noop() [which counts as an implementation for flag
> purposes]; apr
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:30:13PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > In the following lines from readwrite.c line 90, should the if()
> > conditional clause really be an assignment, or is it a typo? It really
> > seems like it should be an equality test
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:30:13PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> In the following lines from readwrite.c line 90, should the if()
> conditional clause really be an assignment, or is it a typo? It really
> seems like it should be an equality test to me...
>
> rv = apr_get_os_error(
In the following lines from readwrite.c line 90, should the if()
conditional clause really be an assignment, or is it a typo? It really
seems like it should be an equality test to me...
rv = apr_get_os_error();
if (rv = APR_FROM_OS_ERROR(ERROR_BROKEN_PIPE))
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At this point, you are trying to second guess the bucket type. If the
> bucket doesn't implement setaside, then it doesn't need setaside.
That's not true... it it doesn't need setaside, it will use
apr_bucket_setaside_noop() [which counts as an impl
20 matches
Mail list logo
