Re: [PATCH] Some named pipe hacking...

2001-06-24 Thread rbb
NT already _has_ NT namedpipes (and so does OS/2). so, you are proposing to 'shackle' the NT named pipes to 'local only', because some unix developers can't be ... well ... uhh... okay, i'll be polite, but it's the same thing, 'might be confused' by something that isn't a unix API.

Re: GCC 2.96 optimization bug

2001-06-24 Thread Dale Ghent
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: | I just ran across a compiler bug when dealing with long long in the GCC | shipped with Mandrake 8.0 (Intel). When -O2 is specified (it's in the | default), it seems to lose the upper 32 bits of the 64 bit integers. | (I was playing with the XML

Re: GCC 2.96 optimization bug

2001-06-24 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Dale Ghent wrote: When Apache was compile sans -O2, everything worked well and there was no segfault. What about -O? You're right... because of a 2.96 snapshot was used in RH, the use of 2.96 (I'm assuming any snapshot. I see that your's was older than mine) should

Re: [PATCH] Some named pipe hacking...

2001-06-24 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 07:18:41PM +0200, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: I'd guess that it wouldn't be too hard on your end to at least post a patch/code (within APR framework) that illustrates what you are talking about. ack. well, a _quick_ one is simple, you are right.

Re: GCC 2.96 optimization bug

2001-06-24 Thread rbb
I just ran across a compiler bug when dealing with long long in the GCC shipped with Mandrake 8.0 (Intel). When -O2 is specified (it's in the default), it seems to lose the upper 32 bits of the 64 bit integers. (I was playing with the XML code in apr-util and the return values from