Re: [PATCH] Allow pthread_mutex_t to be a cross-process lock

2001-07-01 Thread rbb
PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED works for me on AIX 4.3.2 and later. And you will see this is the default for Apache 1.3 for AIX. Are you seeing actual failures or going from memory of conversations past? Memories of conversations with Manoj. AIX may have it working, but I

Re: [PATCH] Can't build locks...

2001-07-01 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Aaron Bannert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 02:53:44AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: On Darwin 1.3.7 I had an error building locks/unix/crossproc.c What was the error? Maybe autoconf is incorrectly detecting some headers or library functions on Darwin that aren't

RE: cvs commit: apr/include apr_sms_trivial.h

2001-07-01 Thread Sander Striker
This is based off of his submission to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from a few weeks ago - he might have a newer version locally that he hasn't posted. There were only minor diffs between my local version and the one posted earlier. Just committed those. There was one fix, but Justin already caught

Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/win32 sendrecv.c

2001-07-01 Thread Cliff Woolley
On 1 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stoddard01/07/01 08:13:35 Modified:network_io/win32 sendrecv.c Log: Back out this portion of Bill Rowe's large file support patch. We should not use the event handle in the apr_file_t to do overlapped i/o on a socket. We either need

Re: cvs commit: apr/include apr_sms_trivial.h

2001-07-01 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 02:56:13PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: This is based off of his submission to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from a few weeks ago - he might have a newer version locally that he hasn't posted. There were only minor diffs between my local version and the one posted

RE: cvs commit: apr/include apr_sms_trivial.h

2001-07-01 Thread rbb
Sander, the CVS commit messages are moderated, and this was the first time you committed something from that account. So, I had to approve the commit message. Sorry it took me so long. :-) Ryan On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Sander Striker wrote: Actually, my cvs is working as of yesterday. I

RE: cvs commit: apr/include apr_sms_trivial.h

2001-07-01 Thread Sander Striker
[...] We probably need to take a look at the list handling and see if we can speed this up a bit. Yeah, I tried trying to walk through the sentinel code last night and my brain just wasn't parsing the code. It does need to be looked at with a fine-toothed comb. I might get around to it

warnings with APR_USE_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE

2001-07-01 Thread Cliff Woolley
Just a heads up on some warnings I'm getting on Solaris 2.6 where APR_USE_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE is selected: locks.c: In function `apr_os_lock_get': locks.c:344: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast locks.c: In function `apr_os_lock_put': locks.c:365: warning:

Re: warnings with APR_USE_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE

2001-07-01 Thread rbb
Does this solve the warnings? Index: locks.h === RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/include/arch/unix/locks.h,v retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -d -b -w -u -r1.35 locks.h --- locks.h 2001/07/01 05:49:44 1.35 +++ locks.h 2001/07/01

RE: cvs commit: apr/include apr_sms_trivial.h

2001-07-01 Thread Sander Striker
Actually, my cvs is working as of yesterday. I commited something and didn't see my commit msg appear, so I decided to wait with the rest. 7 hours later the commit msg did appear and I had chosen today to commit the rest :) I have a local newer version which I will commit today :) Sander