Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
This patch adds a cache to each element in an apr_table_t.
The cache consists of a 32-bit int containing the first 4 bytes
of the element's key, converted to uppercase.
How about something like this:
#ifndef EBCDIC
#define CASE_MASK 0xdfdf
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
> This patch adds a cache to each element in an apr_table_t.
> The cache consists of a 32-bit int containing the first 4 bytes
> of the element's key, converted to uppercase.
How about something like this:
#ifndef EBCDIC
#define CASE_MASK 0xdfdfdfdf
#else
#
This patch adds a cache to each element in an apr_table_t.
The cache consists of a 32-bit int containing the first 4 bytes
of the element's key, converted to uppercase.
This makes it possible to replace strcasecmp calls with inline
integer comparisons. If the integer comparison fails, we can skip
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:37:44PM -0800, Jack Huang wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've got the latest edition of Subversion, after having checked out the
> source codes with subversion-r202. When I compile the source code I get
> this error:
Woah. 202 is an *old* tarball. Please fetch a more current v
