Re: [PATCH] another bucket allocator implementation

2002-04-01 Thread Brian Pane
requests/second --- Test2.0.34 2.0.34 + 2.0.34 + filebaselineBrian's patchCliff's patch 50k.shtml 654 667 686 incl.shtml1870 1992 2007 (I put copies of

Re: [PATCH] another bucket allocator implementation

2002-04-01 Thread Dale Ghent
On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Brian Pane wrote: | requests/second | --- | Test2.0.34 2.0.34 + 2.0.34 + | filebaselineBrian's patchCliff's patch | 50k.shtml 654 667 686 | incl.shtml

Re: [PATCH] another bucket allocator implementation

2002-04-01 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Dale Ghent wrote: I just ran the current HEAD code against your files and a stock httpd.conf (with SSI enabled) against your files. I did this on a dual 300Mhz Ultra2 running Solaris 8 with the -11 kernel patch. Can you do me a favor and run 2.0.34 in the same

Additional inter-process locking mechanism...

2002-04-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Is someone digging into proc_mutex locking using the set of sem_ functions (POSIX semaphores)? It would be cute for systems such as Darwin where the only option is flock()/fcntl()... Pier

Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS

2002-04-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gregames02/04/01 13:07:13 Modified:buildapr_hints.m4 .STATUS Log: FreeBSD: use fcntl cross-process locks by default. Make note of problems experienced with flock and SysV sems. I just committed a fix for flock-based

Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS

2002-04-01 Thread Greg Ames
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gregames02/04/01 13:07:13 Modified:buildapr_hints.m4 .STATUS Log: FreeBSD: use fcntl cross-process locks by default. Make note of problems experienced with flock and SysV sems. I'll update this as appropriate after

[PATCH] -DNO_DETACH and/or apr_proc_detach() confusion?

2002-04-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
This gets -DNO_DETACH working for me with Apache's prefork MPM on Linux and FreeBSD. But from Aaron's commit log for revision 1.34 I gather that this will break daemontools-like programs. How should I get ./httpd -DNO_DETACH to work? Calling setsid() is bogus. This patch avoids the setsid()

Re: cvs commit: apr/build apr_hints.m4

2002-04-01 Thread Jim Jagielski
If SysV is broken, we should prevent that from being used with AcceptMutex as well (until we can figure out *why* it's broken) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gregames02/04/01 13:50:45 Modified:.STATUS buildapr_hints.m4 Log: FreeBSD: switch to FLOCK

Re: Additional inter-process locking mechanism...

2002-04-01 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yes, I am. :) Pier Fumagalli wrote: Is someone digging into proc_mutex locking using the set of sem_ functions (POSIX semaphores)? It would be cute for systems such as Darwin where the only option is flock()/fcntl()... Pier --

[PATCH] Rename apr_explode_localtime to apr_time_exp_lt

2002-04-01 Thread Thom May
As the subject, patches also going to svn and apache dev lists. Cheers, -- Thom May - [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is akin to asking a woman on a date, after you've been pissing on her feet all night. George Broussard, 3D Realms - on PlanetCrap Index: renames_pending