On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> time [(apr_time_t]] Enter
> APR_USEC_PER_SEC [(apr_time_t)100] Enter
Ah. I missed the fact that APR_USEC_PER_SEC has a built-in cast.
Nevermind.
--Cliff
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> It seems that we've decided sometime back that all macro-fns should be
> declared in ucase. Now, we can debate that issue again, but if someone
> could pull up a reference to that thread in the archives it would be
> most cool.
Somewhere in [EMA
At 12:06 PM 6/12/2002, you wrote:
On 12 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +#define APR_TIME_USEC(time) ((apr_int32_t)(time) % APR_USEC_PER_SEC)
> +
> +#define APR_TIME_SEC(time) ((apr_int64_t)(time) / APR_USEC_PER_SEC)
> +
> +#define APR_TIME_FROM_SEC(sec) ((apr_time_t)(sec) * APR_USEC_
At 03:29 PM 6/12/2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
There is no reason for them to be all-uppercase. I hate it when people
use uppercase for functions, including macro functions. All-uppercase
is a convention for symbolic constants, not functions.
It seems that we've decided sometime back that all macr
There is no reason for them to be all-uppercase. I hate it when people
use uppercase for functions, including macro functions. All-uppercase
is a convention for symbolic constants, not functions.
Roy
Title: file lock
Hi,
I saw your post on the web talking about apache file lock but I couldn't understand (http://archive.covalent.net/apr/dev/2001/10/0025.xml).
I'm using apache1.3 and got errors :
--
[Wed May 1 18:00:19 2002] [emerg] (46)No record locks ava
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Miguel Camargo wrote:
> First of all,thank you Cliff and Ryan for your answers!
No problem. :)
> ../apr/include/arch/unix/fileio.h:
>
> at the begining:
>
> #if APR_HAVE_NEWFEATURE_H
> #include
> #endif
Right.
> APR code...
>
> #if APR_HAS_NEWFEATURE ? /* or also APR_HAV
First of all,thank you Cliff and Ryan for your answers!
The feature i want to add is a trick inside the APR just to could manage an
parallel file system or not depending on some parameters.
So i first need to add a header file into ../apr/include/arch/unix/fileio.h
and after that check into the
At 01:06 PM 06/12/2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On 12 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +#define APR_TIME_USEC(time) ((apr_int32_t)(time) %
APR_USEC_PER_SEC)
> +
> +#define APR_TIME_SEC(time) ((apr_int64_t)(time) /
APR_USEC_PER_SEC)
> +
> +#define APR_TIME_FROM_SEC(sec) ((apr_time_t)(sec
On 12 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +#define APR_TIME_USEC(time) ((apr_int32_t)(time) % APR_USEC_PER_SEC)
> +
> +#define APR_TIME_SEC(time) ((apr_int64_t)(time) / APR_USEC_PER_SEC)
> +
> +#define APR_TIME_FROM_SEC(sec) ((apr_time_t)(sec) * APR_USEC_PER_SEC)
> +
> +#define APR_T
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> There are a *few* cases where we use HAVE where we should be using HAS,
> and those ought to be cleaned up. But we're mostly consistent. :)
Responding to this message caused me to take a second and actually go look
at how consistently we're using this
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Miguel Camargo wrote:
> I am trying to modify the APR library just to add some specific features
> in it and use it in Apache.
What kinds of things, just out of curiosity?
> But i have some doubts about the meaning and the differences among the
> macro definitions of:
The f
Unfortunately, this has never been well defined, but I will give the
intent.
APR_HAS_*--> APR supports this feature
APR_USE_*--> APR uses this particular feature as the default
APR_HAVE_* --> These are supposed to be just namespace protected
versions of the autoconf macros. The pr
Hello:
I am trying to modify the APR library just to add some specific features in
it and use it in Apache. But i have some doubts about the meaning and the
differences among the macro definitions of:
APR_HAVE_...
APR_USE_...
APR_HAS_...
In which cases i have to use one of this, which are their
I'm trying to pre-simplify any future patch we might choose to apply for
time handling. Seems like we should clean house before trying any new
games with apr_time_t (including -renaming- apr_time_t and other symbols
that have confused porters.)
I notice especially that server->timeout seems to be
"Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:18:09PM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>> Anyone has a clue on why the default owner for APR bugs is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> and
>> not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Because there is no [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. =) -- justin
Yes the
16 matches
Mail list logo
