Re: cvs commit: apr-site versioning.html

2002-08-17 Thread Branko ibej
Brian Pane wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Ultimately, we must be able to roundtrip from a stat() into a utime() style call without loosing the old value... at least down to the usec. Many systems will track file times down to the msec, at a minimum. Doesn't Posix require these fields to be in

Re: cvs commit: apr-site versioning.html

2002-08-17 Thread Branko ibej
Greg Stein wrote: And that 0.9.0 is going to be whatever is in APR today. If somebody wants their darned pet feature in 1.0, then they can get it code before that date. But I want something *versioned* *today*. SVN users are dyin' cuz we can't point people at a specific APR release. The best we